Tag: Multiscreen

OTT & Multiscreen • Digital Video Series • 8 • Turning Piratez into Consumers, I

2013 October 25 / / 12 Comments

Portfolio - OTT & Multiscreen (VIII. Turning Piratez into Consumers, I, title, web)

Piratez Are Just Disgruntled Consumers

Multiscreen is at the top of the entertainment industry’s agenda for delivering digital video. This is discussed in the context of four main screens: TVs, PCs, tablets and mobile phones. The premise being that multiscreen enables portability, usability and flexibility for consumers. But, there is a fifth screen which is often overlooked – the cornerstone of the entertainment industry – cinema. This digital video ecosystem is not complete without including cinema, and it certainly should be part of the multiscreen discussion. In exploring the phenomenon of digital piracy it is fitting to start from the perspective of the movie theater.

Figure i - Multiscreen Ecosystem - From Cinema to Mobile

Figure i – Multiscreen Ecosystem – From Cinema to Mobile

The magic of the web is no longer about connecting pages and people, but rather about connecting devices and entertainment. As a result there is a renewed focus on capacity and infrastructure, as video – which requires greater bandwidth and storage – takes over the internet.

In today’s digital society, consumers expect their content anytime, anywhere, and on any device. The movie theater is the least flexible medium in this regard. Films are shown at specific times of the day, in specific theaters, and within a window of specific dates. This rigidity applies worldwide – consumers know what to expect from the substandard entertainment supply chain.

Moviegoers – or perhaps more accurately, lovers of cinema – are frustrated. Their frustrations begin with the discrepancies in film release strategies and timing. For example, audiences that saw Quentin Tarantino’s[1] Django Unchained[2] in the United States enjoyed its opening on Christmas day 2012, however, in Europe and other markets, viewers could not pay to see the movie until after the 17th of January 2013. Three weeks may not seem like a lot, but some movies can take months to reach an international audience. Some take so long to reach global theaters that they overlap the domestic USA Blu-Ray release. This delay can seem like an eternity for a desperate fan. This frustrated enthusiasm, combined with a lack of timely availability, leads to the feeling of being treated as a second class citizen – and may lead the over-anxious fan to engage in piracy.

Figure ii - Evolution from the Internet Generation to a Digital Society

Figure ii – Evolution from the Internet Generation to a Digital Society

There has been some evolution in this practice, with certain films being released simultaneously to a domestic and global audience. For example, Avatar[3] was released in theaters on the 10th and 17th of December in most developed markets. But this practice has not yet been institutionalized. Most titles have significant delays between domestic and international releases. This is partly attributed to the lack of a streamlined supply chain; in coordinating press junkets, local advertising, marketing, arranging subtitles or dubbed tracks, film distribution, etc. – all in time for a simultaneous global release. When content eventually moves from a theatrical release to home distribution there are cascading delays for international markets.

The temptation to steal is almost entirely enabled by convenience. Consumers are only a few clicks away from determining who is getting which titles, and when. Some consumers don’t have the patience to wait their turn, and simply steal what they want. Impulse buying, when not available, becomes impulse pilfering.

The monetary value of entertainment decays over time. A movie’s highest valuation is when it is first released. This is precisely the time when piracy is most rampant and peer to peer (P2P) networks light up. Synchronizing theatrical releases with online entertainment services such as iTunes or Netflix collapses release windows, and gives pirates little excuse to steal. If monetization is addressed early, then this can help to mitigate piracy. As interest decays, so does the cost of the title, and the popularity of piracy follows in-step. This value decay continues through the lifetime of the tile, as they reach broadcast distribution, bargain bins, and migrate towards the long-tail[4] (i.e. a large number of titles viewed or sold in small quantities). As titles lose their popularity, they also become harder to obtain as P2P users stop seeding. This scarcity can have a reverse effect to price decay, by increases its value.  It creates an opportunity for providers to monetize long-tail content. If monetization is addressed throughout the title’s life-cycle, then this can also help to mitigate piracy.

Another question to address is how titles on peer-to-peer networks are seemingly available before their official release? This is directly attributed to the geographic disjointedness of title launches onto DVD or Blu-Ray. Discs are available earlier in some countries. These are then purchased, ripped, transcoded, and posted onto torrent sites – sometimes weeks before their release in other geographies.

Figure iii – Relative Release Windows for USA Domestic Movies and their International Release

Figure iii – Relative Release Windows for USA Domestic Movies and their International Release

Geo discrepancies in release dates persist for both theatrical and home distribution, giving a geographically dispersed user-base further ‘justification’ to pirate content. As the largest entertainment market in the world, by revenue, Hollywood suffers the most. Content rights issues play a large role in delays. Aggregators and distributors in remote locations try to balance the cost of licensing a library against how that investment can be recuperated from local sales and subscription fees. In some cases licensing American content is just too expensive. The return on investment is often not justified, due to lower incomes, a smaller population base, or the lack of potential scale. This results is consumers in remote markets having no means of legitimately purchasing American entertainment, leading them to turn to the internet to illegally download what they cannot legally purchase.

Graphic - Turning Piratez into Consumers, I (From the moment a blockbuster movie is announced, demand grows on a grand scale. Some international markets wait impatiently to see the film in their local theater)

Segmenting Markets

Regulation used to be easier for content producers and distributors. The simple implementation of varying analog standards (NTSC[5] for North America, PAL[6] for Europe[7], etc) made sales channel protection relatively simple. This analog fencing lasted for decades, through the television and VHS[8] player age. It even survived the advent of the DVD, even though this was already a digital format. Interestingly, the number of geographical segments increased to six[9] – ostensibly in order to better address purchasing power disparities.

For the most part, analog encoding was enough to deter cross border selling[10]. Blu-Ray discs later carried even tighter encryption, but this did not become a major deterrent for piratez (We will explore the reasons for this later).

The intense competition in the consumer playback market (i.e. DVD and Blue-Ray) forced manufacturers and brands to differentiate. Multi-region players became a great competitive differentiator and soon became an expected feature effectively nullifying restrictions. Even PC based DVD drives, which had prompted users to ‘choose a region’ were soon overcome by hacks, making their forced regionalization more of a hiccup than true protection.

Coming back to NTSC and PAL – one alternative was to use broadcast equipment to convert tapes between formats. But this was expensive, and often had undesirable results. This conversion process was mainly an issue if the source material was recorded initially in NTSC or PAL, such as television shows. On the other hand, converting movies was not such an issue, because film could be natively digitized and then encoded into NTSC using telecine conversion[11]. Or for European distribution, content would be sped up by approximately 4% to match the 25fps of PAL (Hollywood movies are usually filmed at 23.976 frames per second, fps).

As computers become popular as a source of entertainment, broadcast standards were no longer an issue, and conversion unnecessary. Computers simply played content natively, in either NTSC or PAL. Leaving content in their original format became the standard approach.

The introduction of high definition (HD) television in 2005 eliminated many more legacy issues. Flat screens (LCD[12] or Plasma[13]), televisions began shipping with multiple support for both PAL and NTSC. Furthermore, HD finally did away with some of the dated aspects of broadcast, such as non-square pixels, over-scanning, anamorphic formatting[14], and finally standardizing on a single color gamut (Rec. 709)[15]. Even interlaced video is now a thing of the past, surmising from the fact that there are no plans for its support in the next H.265 HEVC[16] video coding standard.

The computing industry should be thanked for many of these changes[17]. Computers certainly leveled the playing field by allowing support for multiple formats. Content moved from physical discs to files on computers – from physical media to cloud media – from broadcast to the internet. Geo-political borders that prevented playback of entertainment were erased by computers as well as the expansion of the internet. High definition video helped to harmonize the technical differences that plagued broadcasting standards.

This leveled playing field also created an environment wherein computers could be used to break encryption codes established by the entertainment industry. Software could “burn” discs onto hard drives, and use the internet to distribute pristine copies of content to all corners of the globe. As much as the computer and internet generation helped the broadcast industry evolve, it also opened new doors for copyright infringement on a massive scale.

How Did We Get Into This Mess?

The advent of the audio cassette[18] and VHS tape[19] brought copyright infringement to the broadcast industry. This became a hot topic once it was evident that consumers had the ability to easily record radio or television programs. For the average consumer, the interpretation of copyright law was confusing. Into the 90’s consumers were uncertain whether backing up music CDs[20] or software CDs was legitimate, even though the practice was wide-spread. A general consensus of how copy written materials could be reproduced was established with the introduction of Fair Use[21]. In the USA this law was incorporated into the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. Ten years after the compact disc was introduced, the Audio Home Recording Act established in 1992 that it was legal to make copies of audio recordings for non-commercial personal use[22]. Fair Use and copyright laws vary on a country by country basis, confusing interpretations of fair usage as technology evolves. Consumers generally follow the principle that making a backup copy is justified if they purchased and have possession of the original CD or software.

Figure iv – Key Initiatives affecting Global Copyright Infringement

Figure iv – Key Initiatives affecting Global Copyright Infringement

Unfortunately Fair Use does not apply to DVD or Blu-Ray. The legal issue with films is not in copying the content itself, but in the circumventing the discs content encryption. The United States Copyright law entitled Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) [23], passed in 1998 – a little over two years after Blu-Ray began shipping – deals with this subject. The DMCA “criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works”[24].

CD’s didn’t have these measures in place, because music discs are not encrypted. CD’s had no copy protection mechanism, while at the same time offering pristine audio quality. With the creation of MP3[25], and subsequent publishing of the standard by the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG[26]) in 1993, consumers had the means to store their music collections onto their personal computers, or any storage media such as flash discs. Sales of blank CDs soared throughout the 90’s, and in 1997 the MP3 player was born[27]. As flash memory prices decreased, it was possible to carry an entire collection of music in an MP3 player. The appeal of digital theft became overwhelming, and the music industry was caught off guard.

Digitization gave users the ability to make pristine copies of just about anything: Music, Movies, Games, and images. The great limitation of analog’s consistent reduction in quality when copying-from-copies, became moot. Today’s digital copies rival that of the original master recordings.

The entertainment industry seemed to have learned from the mistakes of the audio industry when they released the DVD. Not to repeat the copy infringement disaster of the music industry, the movie industry launched the DVD[28] in 1995 using an encrypted format called Content Scrambling System (CSS[29]). This copy protection mechanism failed four years later when Xing Technologies neglected to encrypt the CSS decryption code in one of their DVD players. This allowed Jon Lech Johansen and two unnamed hackers to reverse engineer CSS, and create DeCSS[30]. Several programs eventually became available which decrypted commercially available DVD’s.

Figure v – Selected P2P & Cyber-locker growth per unique user

Figure v – Selected P2P & Cyber-locker growth per unique user

The battle against copy infringement continued with Blu-Ray. This platform employed the Advanced Access Content System (AACS)[31]. Despite significant improvements over its predecessors, SlySoft, an Antigua based software company announced their ability to crack commercially available Blu-Rays. They launched a software package called AnyDVD HD[32] on 17th of February 2007[33]. This unprecedented feat happened only seven months after the first Blu-Ray discs shipped. AnyDVD HD was the first package removing restrictions from Blu-Ray discs, as well as rendering discs region-free.

Entertainment in a Borderless Internet

With the global expanse of the internet, it was clear that the age of client-server[34] communications, developed by Xerox in the 70’s didn’t scale well. A new model emerged in the 90’s promoting client-to-client communications – better known as a peer-to-peer[35] (P2P) networking. Launched in June 1999, Napster[36] popularized this model, used mainly to facilitate the illegal distribution of music files. They were shut down two years later due to mounting pressure, related to copyright infringement lawsuits. KaZaA[37] emerged a few months later, and added several improvements along the way. This file sharing service peaked at 34 million users in 2003, but began to shrink once the RIAA announced their plans to sue P2P users[38] on 25th of June 2003. Whereas Napster used a centralized structure for indexing and searching, KaZaA implemented a direct user-to-user exchange of information without the need for centralized servers[39]. In other words, when Napster shut its doors, then all subscribers were disconnected from each other. But in KaZaA’s case, there was no central source to shut down, making it much more difficult to tear down. KaZaA was later seen to have heralded peer-to-peer’s second ‘decentralized’ generation.

Just as KaZaA launched, the internet was introduced to the third generation of P2P networking: BitTorrent[40], developed by programmer Bram Cohen[41]. BitTorrent quickly gained ground as an extremely effective peer-to-peer protocol. The main difference between P2P’s second generation and BitTorrent, was how files were located and traded. Services such as KaZaA and Gnutella were user-focused networks – users became part of the network, and sent out direct search requests for files. Responses were then received from other members. Alternatively, BitTorrent takes a file-based approach – everyone interested in sharing a file used a tracker to essentially create a network dedicated solely to sharing each file[42].

But peer-to-peer’s association with pirated content has resulted in it being synonymous with copyright infringement. Despite this association, P2P has become a viable solution for the legitimate distribution of business and consumer content. Popular subscription services such as Spotify[43] and communications software such as Skype[44] utilize P2P architecture. Possibly one day torrents will be perceived in a more positive light, but for the time being P2P and BitTorrent are tainted by association.

To combat piracy, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) [45] and Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)[46] began an initiative in November 2004[47] to sue individuals for illegally distributing music and films. By June 2006, over 20,000 people in the United States had lawsuits brought against them[48]. The initiative eventually stopped in 2008 in favor of cooperative enforcement with Internet Service Providers. The most recent iteration of this entails a six-strike policy expected to be enforced sometime in 2013[49]. It involves mounting notifications (strikes) by ISPs resulting in throttling the subscriber’s internet speed, and threatening other penalties.

As the internet became a more viable platform to deliver entertainment, the only way that content owners would allow their assets to be distributed, is if secure Digital Rights Management (DRM) [50] solutions existed. Apple was one of the first to popularize the online distribution of music when it unveiled the iTunes Store[51] in April 2003. FairPlay DRM[52] was used to allay the music industry’s fears of copy infringement. Apple managed to convince content rights owners – namely EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner – to release their libraries to Apple. In an interesting turn of events, Steve Job published an open letter to entitled Thoughts on Music[53] in February 2007. The letter encouraged music publishers to remove DRM from their content. Two years later Apple removed DRM from their music library, but maintained protection for video.

Figure vi – Internet Consumer Traffic Forecast ’11-’16

Figure vi – Internet Consumer Traffic Forecast ’11-’16

Since the turn of the century, album sales have suffered a steady decline – both in unit sales and revenue. The hope was that online distribution would reverse this decline. But even though sales of singles have soared, it has not been enough to compensate for the lost revenue from the sale of complete albums.

The same month that Steve Job published his open letter to the “big four” music companies, Microsoft entered the online content protection space with PlayReady DRM. This platform protects content when videos are streamed over the internet, and can be used on various portable devices. (Coincidentally this was the same month that SlySoft announced their aforementioned AnyDVD HD hacking software).

Both Apple and Microsoft have been successful in their in the development of DRM solutions, but consumer pressure has been mounting requiring the need for cross-platform portability. A new standard and protocol named UltraViolet[54] may come to the rescue. UltraViolet lets consumers purchase a DVD or Blu-Ray movie, either physically or digitally, and allows them to watch a digital version of the title on selected portable devices. This is achieved through the use of a “digital locker” that stores user rights and allows movies to be viewed onto many different screens without having to repurchase the same title multiple times. The main benefit of this solution is its cross device portability of content and its lack of reliance on a single corporation. UltraViolet is backed by over 70 industry players.

Internet piracy has maintained a steady growth curve over the past decade. Figure v shows that piracy continues to rise, with 150 million active users of BitTorrent networks as of January 2012 according to BitTorrent Inc.[55]. The storage and streaming service Megaupload based out of Hong Kong had 180 million registered users before shutting down in January 2012[56]. Preventative measures have not appeared to deter the growth of piracy on an international scale. On one hand, it has been argued that the proliferation of piracy enhances the global promotion of content. The borderless nature of the internet certainly enables a wider propagation of content, for better or worse.

So what is the role of social media in piracy and the entertainment industry? Although still in its infancy, companies such as Trendrr[57] track the relationship between social media chatter and TV ratings. Social networks such as Facebook and Twitter have been identified as a valuable resource to gauge consumer behavior and viewing preferences in real-time. Netflix is even turning to P2P networks to assess social behavior in consuming entertainment. Kelly Merryman, Vice President of Content Acquisition at Netflix has been quoted, as saying that the popularity on file-sharing platforms determines, in part, what TV-series the company buys[58]. While this is interesting, the entertainment industry won’t be thanking internet piracy for its recent successes.

Some proponents of piracy argue that the act of copying[59] is not strictly theft, since the physical act of theft is viewed as the removal of an item from its owner. Their opinion is that piracy is one of copying, and not displacement of the original item. Whichever way you define it, under the umbrella of law, copyright infringement is a criminal offense.

Cisco forecasts that video streaming will take up nearly half of all global internet traffic by 2016[60]. A further 19% will be used for P2P file sharing – 18.9 exabytes of data, or the equivalent of sending an astonishing two billion HD movies over the web (Figure vi). In any protection strategy, content is only as robust as its weakest link. At the moment, the weakest link in the entertainment industry is the circumvention mechanisms available for DVD and Blu-Ray. Next generation protection methods such as 4K UHD content will require far superior protection methods to fortify these assets.

In some markets, peer to peer traffic has declined. According to Netflix, “BitTorrent traffic in Canada dropped 50% after Netflix started there three years ago” [61], attributed to the success of OTT (over the top) services. These online services offer consumers a cost effective, extensive, flexible and immediate on-demand entertainment platform. Consumer purchasing behavior in the presence of an OTT service suggests that if a viable alternative to piracy is available, then they will likely pay for it, and have a little reason to steal content.

Stay Tuned for Part II, III, IV, & V

  • In Part II of “Turning Piratez into Consumers” we will further explore issues surrounding piracy, in the form of a gap analysis of what consumers want from their entertainment.
  • Part III will look into the Net Neutrality and Internet Governance debate, and the , and the debate between the ISP’s and OTT Entertainment providers
  • In Part IV we will gauge the health of the entertainment industry by breaking down the revenue forecasts of the music, film, TV, and gaming industries, in light of internet piracy.
  • In Part V of this series we will propose solutions to reducing internet piracy from the vantage point of a subscriber wish-list.

Read Additional Articles in this Series

I. Consumption is Personal

In the days of linear television, broadcasters had a difficult task in understanding their audience. Without a direct broadcasting and feedback mechanism like the Internet, gauging subscriber behavior was slow. Today, online video providers have the ability to conduct a one-to-one conversation with their audience. Viewing habits of consumers will continue to rapidly change in the next ten years. This will require changes in advertising expenditure and tactics.

II. Granularity of Choice

The evolution from traditional TV viewing to online video has been swift. This has significantly disrupted disc sales such as DVD and Blu-Ray, as well as cable and satellite TV subscriptions. With the newfound ability to consume content anytime, anywhere, and on any device, consumers are re-evaluating their spending habits. In this paper we will discuss these changes in buying behavior, and identify the turning point of these changes.

III. Benchmarking the H.265 Video Experience

Transcoding large video libraries is a time consuming and expensive process. Maintaining consistency in video quality helps to ensure that storage costs and bandwidth are used efficiently. It is also important for video administrators to understand the types of devices receiving the video so that subscribers can enjoy an optimal viewing experience. This paper discusses the differences in quality in popular video codecs, including the recently ratified H.265 specification.

IV. Search & Discovery Is a Journey, not a Destination

Television subscribers have come a long way from the days of channel hopping. The arduous days of struggling to find something entertaining to watch are now behind us. As consumers look to the future, the ability to search for related interests and discover new interests is now established as common practice. This paper discusses the challenges that search and discovery engines face in refining their services in order to serve a truly global audience.

V. Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation

Broadcasting, as a whole, is becoming less about big powerful hardware and more about software and services. As these players move to online video services, subscribers will benefit from the breadth of content they will provide to subscribers. As the world’s video content moves online, solution providers will contribute to the success of Internet video deployments. Support for future technologies such as 4K video, advancements in behavioral analytics, and accompanying processing and networking demands will follow. Migration to a multiscreen world requires thought leadership and forward-thinking partnerships to help clients keep pace with the rapid march of technology. This paper explores the challenges that solution providers will face in assisting curators of content to address their subscriber’s needs and changing market demands.

VI. Building a Case for 4K, Ultra High Definition Video

Ultra High Definition technology (UHD), or 4K, is the latest focus in the ecosystem of video consumption. For most consumers this advanced technology is considered out of their reach, if at all necessary. In actual fact, 4K is right around the corner and will be on consumer wish lists by the end of this decade. From movies filmed in 4K, to archive titles scanned in UHD, there is a tremendous library of content waiting to be released. Furthermore, today’s infrastructure is evolving and converging to meet the demands of 4K, including Internet bandwidth speeds, processing power, connectivity standards, and screen resolutions. This paper explores the next generation in video consumption and how 4K will stimulate the entertainment industry.

VII. Are You Ready For Social TV?

Social TV brings viewers to content via effective brand management and social networking. Users recommend content as they consume it, consumers actively follow what others are watching, and trends drive viewers to subject matters of related interests. The integration of Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and other social networks has become a natural part of program creation and the engagement of the viewing community. Social networks create an environment where broadcasters have unlimited power to work with niche groups without geographic limits. The only limitations are those dictated by content owners and their associated content rights, as well as those entrenched in corporate culture who are preventing broadcasters from evolving into a New Media world.

VIII. Turning Piratez into Consumers

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, I

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, II

X. Turning Piratez into Consumers, III

XI. Turning Piratez into Consumers, IV

XII. Turning Piratez into Consumers, V

Content Protection is a risk-to-cost balance. At the moment, the cost of piracy is low and the risk is low. There are no silver bullets to solving piracy, but steps can be taken to reduce levels to something more acceptable. It is untrue that everyone who pirates would be unwilling to buy the product legally. It is equally evident that every pirated copy does not represent a lost sale. If the risk is too high and the cost is set correctly, then fewer people will steal content. This paper explores how piracy has evolved over the past decades, and investigates issues surrounding copyright infringement in the entertainment industry.

About the Author

Home - Signature, Gabriel Dusil ('12, shadow, teal)Gabriel Dusil was recently the Chief Marketing & Corporate Strategy Officer at Visual Unity, with a mandate to advance the company’s portfolio into next generation solutions and expand the company’s global presence. Before joining Visual Unity, Gabriel was the VP of Sales & Marketing at Cognitive Security, and Director of Alliances at SecureWorks, responsible for partners in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Previously, Gabriel worked at VeriSign & Motorola in a combination of senior marketing & sales roles. Gabriel obtained a degree in Engineering Physics from McMaster University, in Canada and has advanced knowledge in Online Video Solutions, Cloud Computing, Security as a Service (SaaS), Identity & Access Management (IAM), and Managed Security Services (MSS).

All Rights Reserved

© 2013, All information in this document is the sole ownership of the author. This document and any of its parts should not be copied, stored in the document system or transferred in any way including, but not limited to electronic, mechanical, photographs, or any other record, or otherwise published or provided to the third party without previous express written consent of the author. Certain terms used in this document could be registered trademarks or business trademarks, which are in sole ownership of its owners.

Tags

AACS, AnyDVD, Apple, BitTorrent, Blu-Ray, Broadcast, Cisco, Connected TV, Copyright Infringement, CSS, DeCSS, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Digital Rights, Digital Video, DMCA, DRM, FairPlay, File Sharing, Gabriel Dusil, Infringement, Internet Piracy, Internet Video, KaZaA, Megaupload, Megauploader, Motion Picture Association of America, MPAA, Multi-screen, Multiscreen, Napster, New Media, Online Video, OTT, Over the Top Content, OVP, P2P, Peer to Peer, piracy, Piratez, PlayReady DRM, Recording Industry Association of America, RIAA, Ripping, SlySoft, Smart TV, The Pirate Bay, TPB, Ultraviolet DRM, Visual Unity

References

[2] Django Unchained, IMDB, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1853728/

[4] Long Tail Content, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_tail

[7] SECAM is purposely being left out of the discussion to maintain some flow in this discussion.

[8] VHS, Video Home System, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VHS

[16] H.265, High Efficiency Video Coding, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Video_Coding

[18] Magnetic tape sound recording, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_tapes
Philips, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philips

[20] Compact Disc, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD

[22] Audio Home Recording Act, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_Home_Recording_Act

[23] DMCA, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act

[24] A short disclaimer: This paper is not meant to dismantle the interpretation of DMCA or other copyright laws, domestically or internationally. But rather provide a historical context to the current state of internet piracy.

[27] Portable media player, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_media_player

[29] Content Scramble System, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Scramble_System

[31] Advanced Access Content System (AACS), Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Access_Content_System

[38] “14% of Internet users say they no longer download music files”, by Lee Rainie, Graham Mudd, Mary Madden, Dan Hess, 24th Apr 2004, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2004/14-of-Internet-users-say-they-no-longer-download-music-files/Data-Memo.aspx

[39] Timeline of file sharing, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_file_sharing

[42] “What’s the difference between BitTorrent, LimeWire and KaZaA?”, by Dave Taylor, 5th Feb, 2007, http://www.askdavetaylor.com/difference_between_bittorrent_limewire_and_kazaa/

[48] Trade group efforts against file sharing, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_group_efforts_against_file_sharing

[49] “Verizon six strikes anti-piracy policy throttles you after fifth offense”, by Grant Brunner, 11th January 2013, ExtremeTech, http://www.extremetech.com/internet/145498-verizon-six-strikes-anti-piracy-policy-throttles-you-after-fifth-offense

[52] FairPlay DRM, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairPlay

[53] “Thoughts on Music”, by Steve Jobs, 6th February 2007 http://www.apple.com/ca/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/

[55] “BitTorrent and µTorrent Software Surpass 150 Million User Milestone; Announce New Consumer Electronics Partnerships”, BitTorrent Inc., 16th September 2013, http://www.bittorrent.com/intl/es/company/about/ces_2012_150m_users

[57] “With Trendrr Acquisition, Twitter Continues To Beef Up Its Social TV Efforts”, by Anthony Ha, 28th August 2013, http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/28/twitter-continues-to-beef-up-its-social-tv-efforts-with-trendrr-acquisition/

[58] “Netflix Uses Pirate Sites to Determine What Shows to Buy”, 14th September, 2013 http://torrentfreak.com/netflix-uses-pirate-sites-to-determine-what-shows-to-buy-130914/

[61] “BitTorrent: The key to Netflix’s taste-making success?”, by Chris Gayomali, The Week, http://theweek.com/article/index/249676/bittorrent-the-key-to-netflixs-taste-making-success

OTT & Multiscreen – The Rise, Fall… and Rise of the Entertainment Industry

2013 September 24 / / 0 Comments

Graphic - The Rise, Fall... and Rise of the Entertainment Industry (title)

Synopsis

The Internet has truly changed the playing field of entertainment.  With each company that shuts its doors, many more have opened to capitalize on this ever-evolving eMarketplace. The net effect has been certainly disruptive across the music, movie, broadcast, and gaming industries. Disruption can be discussed in a positive and negative context. Some industry proponents blame copyright infringement for their revenue decline. Others thank the unabated proliferation of their content through the Internet, in reaching an untapped global audience. Is the sky falling on the entertainment industry, or is it thriving?  Should we be thanking the internet, or blame it.  Is this a failure of legacy business models or is it just the evolution of technology?  This presentation explores the effect that the Internet has had on the entertainment industry, and looks towards how subscriber behavior is advancing their consumption of entertainment.

View the recorded video presentation from IBC ‘13 at:

This session was presented by Gabriel Dusil, Senior VP of Marketing & Corporate Strategy at Visual Unity, and was broadcasted live at IBC ’13, in Amsterdam on the 14th of September 2013, via the Broadcast Show (http://www.broadcastshow.com/), and powered by TV Bay.

OTT & Multiscreen • Digital Video Series • 7 • Are You Ready For Social TV?

2013 August 12 / / 16 Comments
Graphic - Are You Ready For Social TV (title, web)
The broadcast market is facing the most significant paradigm shift in history, with traditional linear television struggling to meet the demands of an emerging multiscreen audience. Any broadcaster that has not yet implemented a TV-PC-Tablet-Smartphone strategy, and is still managing its operations with linear tape-based workflows is missing out on a massive audience – a demographic of mobile video subscribers – a group that is growing at a faster pace than in any previous technology in history. This change is driven by a desire not only to consume media on multiple devices, but to interact with this content across social, geographic, and cultural boundaries.
Figure i – Global Forecast of PC, Smartphone and Tablet to 2016

Figure i – Global Forecast of PC, Smartphone and Tablet to 2016

Top tier broadcasters are not oblivious to the multiscreen movement. It could even be argued that they have led the evolution; from switching off analogue services by 2015[1], to upgrading their back-end systems to file-based workflow, high definition, and IP[2] delivery[3] (Figure iii). At any rate, entertainment industry leaders have been  taken by surprise, due to the speed of technology adoption of these new market entrants. Telcos, internet providers, enterprises and innovative start-ups are positioning themselves as online video service providers – all vying for market attention. While broadcasters struggle to realign their business and operational strategies, those pushing the TV experience out of the traditional living room, and into the new social media marketplace, have driven this momentum.

Figure ii – Global Installed Base of Connected TV Devices

Figure ii – Global Installed Base of Connected TV Devices

While television’s grip on the household remains strong, its dominance is diminishing as audiences utilize connected and interactive consumer electronics. Video is now detached from the sofa, and has gone mobile. Market research by Business Insider™[4] reports shipments of smartphones already surpassing PC sales. Tablets and other internet connected devices are expected to surpass PC sales beyond 2016 (Figure i). But it’s not only smartphones and tablets. As more and more device manufacturers seek out new revenue streams, connected internet devices now include media streamers, game consoles, set top boxes (STBs) and Blu-Ray players. Topping this list are connected TV’s, which are expected to take nearly 50% market share by 2016, according to Informa[5]. (Figure ii). Traditional broadcasters that only focus on the living room will inevitably see their subscribers moving to competing services with enhanced multiscreen capabilities.

Some industry insiders are anticipating the fate of television to that of the desktop computer. It is more likely, however, that consumers will simply enjoy new ways to view their video, and share those experiences with others. Social TV is about interaction. Television is no longer a monologue to a broad audience. It is now a one-to-one dialog with known subscribers.. According to Nielsen™[6], mobile devices are increasingly being used for social networking, product research, and shopping (Figure iv). In a Social TV context, the television is no longer just a passive monitor in the living room, but an interactive and personalized screen. On a basic level Social TV enables:

  • Second screen interactions with friends and family
  • Sharing comments, ‘likes’, ratings, criticisms, and recommendations
  • Discussions on a film or series story-line, their actors, writers and directors
  • Tweeting reactions to a live news broadcast, or posting opinions onto Facebook
  • Integrating consumer behavior and demographics into viewing patterns and targeted advertising
  • Voting, trivia and sweepstakes in real-time

Broadcasters are aware of these subtleties, however, despite changes in consumer behavior, many are still struggling with how to secure their position in the Social TV era. With the focus of entertainment consumption on any device, anywhere, and at any time, what are the expectations for Social TV?  How should broadcasters position themselves in this new space and remain competitive? The remainder of this paper will explore some of the challenges that the entertainment industry faces in the Social TV era, and explore strategic principles necessary to remain competitive.

Figure iii – Top Trends for the Global Broadcast Industry

Figure iii – Top Trends for the Global Broadcast Industry

Social TV Challenges

An effective Social TV strategy calls for more than simply delivering content from a strategic brand. It’s about the user experience. The global proliferation of mobile devices is changing the very nature of content consumption. The growth of streaming video is forcing broadcasters to develop innovative strategies to protect their installed base.

The first challenge is in the development of applications for social media engagement across a wide range of devices.  Apps are the digital bridges between entertainment and computing. Traversing this path is no easy task for broadcasters that are struggling to familiarize themselves with the world of software.

Graphic - Are You Ready For Social TV (iii.1. 40% of consumers are using social media while watching TV

From a delivery perspective, there are challenges in reaching a mobile audience. Two such hurdles are the lack of feature-rich smartphones and mobile bandwidth, for live video streaming in some markets. Moving content to the cloud enhances the experience for some subscribers, but cloud coverage is still sparse in many regions beyond the USA, Europe, and Asia. The majority of global subscribers do not have access to  high mobile speeds which leads to reliance on costly Content Delivery Networks (CDN) to provide effective local streaming.

From an operations perspective, the publication of online and mobile content is often labor-intensive and disconnected from traditional broadcast workflows. In many organizations the preparation of online content, transcoding, adding metadata, and reformatting of content to suit various mobile devices is still a manual process. This fragmented workflow from content creation through to consumer consumption, means that broadcasters often lack the agility to rapidly respond to changes in subscriber behavior, or the need to quickly deliver content from one end to the other (i.e. content creation to consumption).

Financially, broadcasters are facing greater competition than ever before. They are losing audiences not only to streamlined multiscreen content providers but also to online service providers that are leap-frogging the traditional distribution model and reaching their subscribers directly. These new “Over the Top” (OTT) content providers completely bypass traditional programming by connecting TV’s directly to the Internet. Subscribers are reviewing their monthly bills, and asking themselves  why they should stay with their Pay TV provider when they can have a lower cost internet video services instead? – A service that supports multiple devices, and provides exciting social interaction. Such questions have led to some consumers “cutting-the-cord” to their Pay TV service.

Finally, changing the mindset from a content-centric to an experience-centric ideology is a major challenge for traditional broadcasters. Entertainment is not just about content – it is an immersive experience. Content must provide a total experience for consumers to enjoy it (and pay for it!). An extremely important component of this development is the User Interface (UI) and the User Experience (UX). Content itself is still central to the buying behavior of subscribers, but UI/UX is essential to its sale. The consumption of content has changed because content that was once languishing on tape, in storage, can now be readily available online. Subscribers no longer have to wait  for a designated broadcast slot to watch a movie on their TV. They can watch that movie anytime, anywhere, and on any device. The differentiator is now the environment in which that content is consumed. There is greater competition for grabbing the attention of consumers: Internet video, social networking, mobile apps, gaming, search & discovery all form the architecture of an exciting UI/UX application.

In this fast moving entertainment landscape consumers need to be sheltered from technological complexity. Apple’s iPhone is an excellent example of complex technology hidden behind a wonderful UI/UX. An elegant front-end experience should mask the complex workflow or processing that is needed to ensure an enriched end-user experience. Maximizing revenue is about a boundless and untethered consumption of content in an environment where the residents wants to stay and play.

Nimble content providers are solidifying themselves as viable competitors in an increasingly tech-savvy and discerning audience simply by providing a superior environment. Broadcasters initially dismissed these providers as viable competitors, but they have since emerge over the past decade as formidable players. Subscribers now have more choice in how they view, consume, and react to content. To paraphrase a popular saying, it’s not just that Content is King, it’s how the viewer enjoys their trip to the Kingdom, and has fun during their stay. This is the essence of an exceptional user experience.

Figure iv – Mobile Device Activity While Watching TV

Figure iv – Mobile Device Activity While Watching TV

A Business Case for Social TV

The one-to-one relationship of Social TV enables a more personal relationship with consumers, for better or worse. Putting privacy issues aside, the audience is no longer an anonymous group of faceless subscribers. Each consumer can be treated individually in an ecosystem of content, advertising, and common interest.

Content Monetization

  • The three most common forms of content monetization include; revenue based on advertising (the basis of broadcast television for over 60 years); transactional model (used in Video On Demand purchase and rental services); and a subscription model (popular with cable and satellite Pay TV services). Developing compelling services that reduce client churn is one of the main challenges today. Extended offerings out of the living room and into an untethered mobile lifestyle leverages this growing multi-platform user base. Providers will need to find a balance between premium and ‘freemium’ content. YouTube is already dispelling the myth that freemium is not a viable business model. After all, when a YouTube channel has over one million followers, new doors are opened to monetize content using social media and other interactive means.
  • For owners of entertainment assets; system requirements include the monetization of content via a balanced combination of ads, subscriptions, or transactions; the ability to adapt quickly to new and evolving consumer behavior; quick implementation of new campaigns; integration with multiple social networks; portable and untethered content rights protection. Service providers also need the ability to integrate new technology without significantly disrupting their current best practices. Realizing a Social TV solution strategy requires putting the consumer at the center, where previously content held pride of place.

Advertising Revenue

Figure v – Ad Spending by Consumer Time & Media Type, ‘11

Figure v – Ad Spending by Consumer Time & Media Type, ‘11

  • Social TV allows broadcasters to expand online advertising revenue streams. Recent reports estimate global internet ad revenue worth 36.5 billion US$[8] in 2012. An increase of 15% from the previous year. The time spent on viewing online media is growing, thanks to mobility, however advertisers are currently playing catch-up. According to eMarketer™, online ad spending is expected to reach 50 billion US$ in 2015[9].
  • Correlating advertisement spending against consumer time reveals an interesting disparity in how dollars are being spent. According to a study by Business Insider Intelligence™[10] consumers are spending much less time on print publications compared to advertising spend (Figure v). Conversely, mobile advertising is being under-utilized when compared to subscriber’s time spent on mobile devices. Advertisers will need to address this disparity if they are to capitalize on Social TV trends.

Graphic - Are You Ready For Social TV (v.1. Content may still be king, but it’s the consumer’s journey to this content that make up the kingdom)

Audience Engagement

  • Real-time Audience engagement not only builds brand loyalty but offers opportunities for revenue generation. Personalized interactions via comments, voting, chats and sharing on global social networks are being used to build behavioral profiles within CRM (Client Relationship Management). Integration with social media allows almost unlimited growth of ‘friends’, or ‘followers’ as a route to expanded viewership. Adding mobility adds a new dimension, which expands both the hours spent with media, and their engagement with advertisers.
  • For the subscriber; an appealing user-experience (UX) enables content feedback.  Shared experiences translate to suggestions and recommendations. Content delivery should work cross-devices and operating systems – even when switching between devices in mid-view. Consumers want content that has no geographical limitations and where digital rights do not spoil their enjoyment.

Graphic - Are You Ready For Social TV (v.2. As content is readily accessible, through many online services, the focus is taken away from ‘Content is king’)

Social TV Revenue Generation

Broadcasters are well positioned to generate revenue from Social TV by extending their existing business models. It is essential for the entertainment industry to realize the value of correlating content within the context of an interactive community, putting subscribers at the focal point of the entertainment value chain.

In the linear television era, reports that measured audience behavior (such as they were) came back late, had statistical errors, and there were always concerns that the sample chosen, didn’t quite represent the overall audience.  Advertising in social media is about understanding the viewer – not as a group, but as individuals. Technology now allows for targeted advertising to individual subscribers – something traditional television has never been able to achieve – this is done in real-time and at a granular scale. Advertising dollars are otherwise wasted when commercials or banner advertisements are displayed in the wrong geography, on the wrong web page, or even to the wrong consumer. Advertising on a personal level becomes relevant and more valuable through the correlation of socio-demographic[11], geolocation[12], and historical behavior analytics[13].

Real-time analytics and statistics are vital tools in understanding the success or failure of a campaign. Marketing success is generally measured by the ratio between leads generated in a campaign to the number of prospects which have actually bought the product. Online campaigns are typically measured by CPM[14] (Cost per Impression), CPV[15] (Cost per View), PPC[16] (Pay per Click), and CPA[17] (Cost per Action). Beyond these metrics, advertisements that are geo-location sensitive, ensuring they are “in-view”, and that the correct brand is served with the website’s content, are important to ensure that prospects, web-content and ads are all correctly associated.

Another feature to take into account is the increasing tendency to interact with multiple devices simultaneously. The youth segment is often using the smart phone as their 2nd screen.  Adults find themselves using their tablets as they relax on the sofa, or in bed, for an evening of television. Regardless of age, subscribers interact, comment, and critique their entertainment in real-time. This simultaneous consumption of entertainment while communicating with remotely displaced friends, family and followers is part of today’s Social TV ecosystem.

Understanding the behavior of end-users is essential to a modern marketing and sales strategy. A recent report from Forrester Research™ shows an overwhelming influence of social media on the consumption of video, audio, images and documents[18] (Figure vi). The influence of peer suggestions drive subscribers to fresh videos, music, blogs, and podcasts – content that would be otherwise undiscovered using traditional means.  And video leads the pack for internet-based consumption. It’s also worth noting from this study, that there is little disparity between European and North American consumer behavior.

How subscribers interact with multiscreen devices (TV, PC, tablet or smartphone), whether sequentially or in parallel opens new revenue generating opportunities for content owners:

  • Commercials providing additional product information to support their product, eg .the TV show Top Gear’s[19] road test review coinciding with a car commercial.
  • Sports broadcasts offering additional statistics related to a live event, or behind the scenes footage of a favorite player.
  • Reality and game shows – See who your friend’s voted for. Play on a 2nd screen game for additional prizes, or enter a sweepstakes.
  • Education – provide supplementary videos or reference materials to support educational content. Push relevant content to students during a live lecture.
  • Shopping – check if your friends, family or followers liked the product before deciding to buy
  • Film – receive additional scene details, camera angles, or plot clues, while watching a movie[20]

As subscribers become more engaged within these environments, revenue opportunities have the potential to increase proportionally.

Figure vi – How Subscribers Consumer Internet Content

Figure vi – How Subscribers Consumer Internet Content

In summary, competition is growing for traditional providers of entertainment. With new entrants competing for market share, broadcasters require changes in corporate culture to adapt to a changing market landscape. Consumers are getting smarter how they want their entertainment. They are also becoming more demanding. What was considered a revolutionary technological breakthrough yesterday, quickly becomes today’s norm. Social TV provides the industry with a real-time forum for reacting to entertainment. Traditional television could never achieve that level of granularity in measuring audience behavior, be it comments, criticism, ratings, voting, or suggestions, Social TV brings a new level of real-time response back to the entertainment industry.

 

Read Additional Articles in this Series

I. Consumption is Personal

In the days of linear television, broadcasters had a difficult task in understanding their audience. Without a direct broadcasting and feedback mechanism like the Internet, gauging subscriber behavior was slow. Today, online video providers have the ability to conduct a one-to-one conversation with their audience. Viewing habits of consumers will continue to rapidly change in the next ten years. This will require changes in advertising expenditure and tactics.

II. Granularity of Choice

The evolution from traditional TV viewing to online video has been swift. This has significantly disrupted disc sales such as DVD and Blu-Ray, as well as cable and satellite TV subscriptions. With the newfound ability to consume content anytime, anywhere, and on any device, consumers are re-evaluating their spending habits. In this paper we will discuss these changes in buying behavior, and identify the turning point of these changes.

III. Benchmarking the H.265 Video Experience

Transcoding large video libraries is a time consuming and expensive process. Maintaining consistency in video quality helps to ensure that storage costs and bandwidth are used efficiently. It is also important for video administrators to understand the types of devices receiving the video so that subscribers can enjoy an optimal viewing experience. This paper discusses the differences in quality in popular video codecs, including the recently ratified H.265 specification.

IV. Search & Discovery Is a Journey, not a Destination

Television subscribers have come a long way from the days of channel hopping. The arduous days of struggling to find something entertaining to watch are now behind us. As consumers look to the future, the ability to search for related interests and discover new interests is now established as common practice. This paper discusses the challenges that search and discovery engines face in refining their services in order to serve a truly global audience.

V. Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation

Broadcasting, as a whole, is becoming less about big powerful hardware and more about software and services. As these players move to online video services, subscribers will benefit from the breadth of content they will provide to subscribers. As the world’s video content moves online, solution providers will contribute to the success of Internet video deployments. Support for future technologies such as 4K video, advancements in behavioral analytics, and accompanying processing and networking demands will follow. Migration to a multiscreen world requires thought leadership and forward-thinking partnerships to help clients keep pace with the rapid march of technology. This paper explores the challenges that solution providers will face in assisting curators of content to address their subscriber’s needs and changing market demands.

VI. Building a Case for 4K, Ultra High Definition Video

Ultra High Definition technology (UHD), or 4K, is the latest focus in the ecosystem of video consumption. For most consumers this advanced technology is considered out of their reach, if at all necessary. In actual fact, 4K is right around the corner and will be on consumer wish lists by the end of this decade. From movies filmed in 4K, to archive titles scanned in UHD, there is a tremendous library of content waiting to be released. Furthermore, today’s infrastructure is evolving and converging to meet the demands of 4K, including Internet bandwidth speeds, processing power, connectivity standards, and screen resolutions. This paper explores the next generation in video consumption and how 4K will stimulate the entertainment industry.

VII. Are You Ready For Social TV?

Social TV brings viewers to content via effective brand management and social networking. Users recommend content as they consume it, consumers actively follow what others are watching, and trends drive viewers to subject matters of related interests. The integration of Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and other social networks has become a natural part of program creation and the engagement of the viewing community. Social networks create an environment where broadcasters have unlimited power to work with niche groups without geographic limits. The only limitations are those dictated by content owners and their associated content rights, as well as those entrenched in corporate culture who are preventing broadcasters from evolving into a New Media world.

VIII. Turning Piratez into Consumers

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, I

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, II

X. Turning Piratez into Consumers, III

XI. Turning Piratez into Consumers, IV

XII. Turning Piratez into Consumers, V

Content Protection is a risk-to-cost balance. At the moment, the cost of piracy is low and the risk is low. There are no silver bullets to solving piracy, but steps can be taken to reduce levels to something more acceptable. It is untrue that everyone who pirates would be unwilling to buy the product legally. It is equally evident that every pirated copy does not represent a lost sale. If the risk is too high and the cost is set correctly, then fewer people will steal content. This paper explores how piracy has evolved over the past decades, and investigates issues surrounding copyright infringement in the entertainment industry.

About the Author

Home - Signature, Gabriel Dusil ('12, shadow, teal)Gabriel Dusil was recently the Chief Marketing & Corporate Strategy Officer at Visual Unity, with a mandate to advance the company’s portfolio into next generation solutions and expand the company’s global presence. Before joining Visual Unity, Gabriel was the VP of Sales & Marketing at Cognitive Security, and Director of Alliances at SecureWorks, responsible for partners in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Previously, Gabriel worked at VeriSign & Motorola in a combination of senior marketing & sales roles. Gabriel obtained a degree in Engineering Physics from McMaster University, in Canada and has advanced knowledge in Online Video Solutions, Cloud Computing, Security as a Service (SaaS), Identity & Access Management (IAM), and Managed Security Services (MSS).

All Rights Reserved

©2013, All information in this document is the sole ownership of the author. This document and any of its parts should not be copied, stored in the document system or transferred in any way including, but not limited to electronic, mechanical, photographs, or any other record, or otherwise published or provided to the third party without previous express written consent of the author. Certain terms used in this document could be registered trademarks or business trademarks, which are in sole ownership of its owners.

Tags

Broadcast, CDN, Connected TV, Content Delivery Networks, Cost per Action, Cost per Impression, Cost per View, CPA, CPM, CPV, Digital Video, entertainment industry, Gabriel Dusil, Internet Video, Linear Broadcast, Monetization, Multi-screen, Multiscreen, New Media, Nielsen, Online Video, Online Video Platform, OTT, Over the Top Content, Pay-per-click, PPC, Smart TV, Social TV, Television, TV, Visual Unity

References

[1] Geneva 2006 Agreement signaled the international mandate to turn of analog broadcasting by 2015, http://www.nettvett.no/ikbViewer/Content/Jan-Doeven-CEPT.pdf?documentID=50378

[2] Internet Protocol

[3] “BBS Broadcast Industry Global Trend Index: 2010 – 2012”, Devoncroft, http://blog.devoncroft.com/2012/04/05/largest-ever-study-of-broadcast-market-reveals-top-industry-trends-of-2012/

[5] Informa Telecoms & Media – Global Installed Base of Connected TV Devices ’11-16

[7] “some 40% of consumers are using social media while watching TV, talking and reading about the shows and movies on the big screen. This number is as high as 74% when looking at consumers with a broadband connection, according to Ovum”, OTT Goes Global – Worldwide Survey of Over-The-Top Video Services Report, http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2059220/ott_goes_global_a_worldwide_survey_of

[9] “eMarketer: Online Ad Spending Expected to Accelerate This Year To $31 Billion”, by Erick Schonfeld, Tech Crunch, http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/08/online-ad-spending-31-billion/

[10] Business Insider Intelligence, intelligence.businessinsider.com/

[13] Applied behavior analysis, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_behavior_analysis

[14] CPM, Cost per impression. A measurement of how many times an advertisement is displayed, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_per_impression

[15] CPV, Cost per View. Considered a more accurate representation of success from CPM as it measures how many times an advertisement is displayed and in view. Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_advertising

[16] PPC, Pay per click. The total number of ad clicks that bring the prospect to your web-site. Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay_per_click

[17] CPA, Cost Per Action. For example, a payment is made only when a prospects successfully clicks to buy a product. Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_per_action

[18] Forrester – Boost Your Content Ecosystem With Video (12.May). This study used a base sample of 16,473 online European adults (18+) & 57,924 online US adults (18+) http://www.forrester.com/Boost+Your+Content+Ecosystem+With+Video/fulltext/-/E-RES61457

[20] Second Screen Experiences Will Change The Way We Watch Films, by Nestor Bailly, PSFK, 25th July 2013, http://iq.intel.com/iq/36323410/how-second-screen-experiences-will-change-the-way-we-watch-films?goback=%2Egde_2188349_member_261253203

OTT & Multiscreen • Digital Video Series • 6 • Building a Case for 4K, Ultra High Definition Video

2013 July 15 / / 15 Comments

Graphic - Building a Case for 4K (title, web)

I Want My 4K MTV!

The future of digital video is expanding in all directions; from the size of the living room TV, to the depth of content selection, and to the different types of devices which serve content. A culmination of technologies is brewing that is bringing an IMAX-esque[1] experience to the living room. It is not difficult to imagine that in the next ten years subscribers will be unraveling and gluing their TV’s onto their wall. A culmination of the following innovations will make this happen:

  • Televisions are growing to the size of an entire wall. Several 100” television sets (2.5 meter diagonal) have been introduced to the market over the years, and prototypes of even larger screens have also been showcased. As screen sizes continue to increase, the only limiting factor will be the available wall space.
  • Displays are verging on the thinness of credit cards, thanks to technology such as OLED[2]. Organic Light-emitting Diode, displays have been recently introduced in 2013 as thin as 4mm[3] by LG[4]. Although OLED had a slow start due to high manufacturing costs and other technical issues, it still offers a promising future for ultra-thin and ultra-high resolution displays. Namely due to the fact that each pixel is self-emissive (i.e. they emit light without requiring a back-lit layer). As screens become thinner, this leads to the inevitable availability of…
  • Flexible displays[5].  These have also been announced from manufacturers such as Sony[6], Samsung[7], as well as display technology manufacturer, Corning[8].
  • Higher resolutions are now being introduced to the market such as 4K[9] (aka. UHD, Ultra High Definition video).  When display technology verges on the size of walls, then even 4K will not satisfy consumers, and 8K, or higher will begin to steal the attention of consumers.
  • Computing power to crunch through all that Ultra High resolution data is readily available.
  • The ability to deliver hundreds of megabytes in bandwidth[10] to the average consumer is on the horizon.
Figure i – Top 16 cities for High-speed connections @35 US$ per month

Figure i – Top 16 cities for High-speed connections @35 US$ per month

These advances in home video may seem like a distant dream, but the future is closer than most realize. 4K television was a hot topic at the Consumer Electronics Show, CES ’13[11], in Las Vegas this year. But some consumers may feel that 4K has been introduced too soon. Especially considering that Blu-Ray only recently reached strong sales momentum, and HDTV[12] has finally established a firm foothold in the living room – penetrating also the mobile market. So why 4K video, and why now?

Graphic - Building a Case for 4K (i.1. Despite the absence of readily accessible 4K content

When viewed from the perspective of technology penetration, this is the perfect time to introduce Ultra HD. Higher resolution displays immediately benefit consumers wanting the most real-estate on their devices. More windows, icons, and widgets can be displayed side-by-side in all their high-resolution glory. Businesses and enthusiasts have already been using display resolutions higher than HD for several years. For example, the popularity of 2650×1600[14] (2.5K displays perhaps?) steadily increased as prices dipped below $1000. More recently, Apple released their retina[15] displays in the latest generation of iPad’s (2048×1536 resolution at 264 pixels per inch, ppi) and MacBook Pro laptops, at even higher resolutions (2880×1800 @ 220 ppi). Consumers are quickly becoming acclimated to high pixel densities. Retina displays enhance the subscriber’s viewing experience on smartphones, tablets, and laptops, and create a precursor for ultra-high resolution content.

So how will this Ultra HD content reach the subscriber in the first place? Some cities already offer bandwidth that can accommodate a 4K live video stream[16]. According to New America Foundation[17], at least 12 cities currently offer affordable download speeds above 30Mbps (Figure i) – This is well within the bandwidth requirements of a single 4K video live stream[18] (assuming typical streaming quality, and that the internet pipe isn’t being used for anything else). Moreover, this is offered at a very reasonable fee of 35 US$ per month[19]. At a national level, Asia Pacific rank in the top three. European countries share six of the top ten positions, and the United States holds steady in ninth place (Table I). Even though the national average of some countries can barely accommodate a real-time high definition stream (typically between 4Mbps to 8Mbps used for online HD streaming), the peak download speeds exceeds 30Mbps are enjoyed in a select number of cities around the world.

Table I - Top Countries for Average & Peak Internet Speeds

Table I – Top Countries for Average & Peak Internet Speeds

In any case, sending 4K over today’s internet connections will not be optimal using today’s encoding standards. Streaming encoders would need to utilize the newly finalized H.265[i] format. Current tests show a 15%-20% improvement on the currently ubiquitous H.264 codec, but as implementations of the codec are optimized, promises of a 50% improvement in compression efficiency is anticipated. This means that a 4K movie streaming with a frame aspect ratios of 2:39:1 (aka. CinemaScope typical for Hollywood movies) could be delivered quite comfortably within an existing 30Mbps internet connection. Alternatively (as shown in Table II[ii]), in the case of a Video on Demand (VoD[iii]) service, a 4K movie could be downloaded within 1.5 hours over a 30Mbps connection. HD content using the same service would download in just under 20 minutes, and standard definition (SD) content would complete in little over six minutes[iv].

Figure ii – 4K digital video to the Consumer - Minimizing the Bottleneck

Figure ii – 4K digital video to the Consumer – Minimizing the Bottleneck

This begs the question; Is there a bottleneck today, in delivering 4K video to consumers? In fact, it could be argued that  for major cities in the top 40 countries in the world, there no bottleneck[17]. Internet speeds are continually improving, expanding to new cities, and becoming affordable. Further down the pipe, WiFi standards such as 802.11ac[v] promise theoretical bandwidth capabilities from 87Mbps and higher, to comfortably carry several 4K streams (Figure ii). Alternatively, LAN[vi] speeds of 100Mbps have been available for over a decade, in consumer electronics. As for the final connection between the set-top-box and the TV, the current iteration of HDMI 1.4 already has the capacity to deliver a 3840×2160p (progressive scan) signal at 24 or 30 frames per second, (or 4096×2160p at 24fps). But it is the development of HDMI 2.0, currently in the works, that will extend support to 60fps. This is important because broadcasters will send 4K content to subscribers at their usual 60 frames per second (fps) used in the USA, or 50fps (used in Europe). Furthermore, HDMI v2.0 will support a Transition-Minimized Differential Signal (TMDS[vii]) of 18Gbps which is ample bandwidth for the final delivery of uncompressed 4K video to the television.

Table II - File size, & download times by Video type

Table II – File size, & download times by Video type

To be fair, the main bottleneck in delivering 4K video to consumers is likely in the processing power of the devices responsible for encoding and decoding video. H.265 is expected to take as much as ten times longer  to encode video, compared to H.264. Furthermore, 4K has four times the real-estate compared to HD.  Therefore, curators of video transcoding should anticipate at least a 40x increase in encoding time when comparing HD@H.264 encoding to 4K@H.265. Thankfully, decoding of H.265 is only two to three times more costly compared to H.264.  So adding 4K to the frame will require consumer processors to be at least ten times more powerful than they are today. Whether it be a set-top box, gaming console, or media center appliance, these CPUs will need to be; a) powerful enough to decode 4K in combination with H.265; and b) affordable for the price sensitive consumer electronics (CE) market.

Figure iii - Flexible Displays by PowerFilm

Figure iii – Flexible Displays by PowerFilm

An IMAX-esque Experience

While a full back-catalog of digitally restored Blu-Ray content is voraciously being released on a weekly basis, there are looming questions regarding the absence of available 4K content. Certainly, 4K TV can only be successful if content is available to take advantage of its glorious resolution. But this leads to the inevitable chicken and egg predicament; Which should come first, a) the infrastructure supply chain all the way down to the display, or b) the content?  It certainly makes sense that display technology should precede the release of complementary content, and this has ultimately been the industry approach for introducing 4K.

Graphic - Building a Case for 4K (iii.1. To the annoyance of collectors that replaced their DVD’s with Blu-Rays

To fuel the anticipated transition to UHD, a wave of film restoration over the past decade has resulted in the scanning and digitizing the Hollywood back-catalog. Thanks to digital restoration pioneers such as Lowry Digital[ii], now owned by Reliance Big Entertainment, high ticket items such as the Disney[iii] and the James Bond[iv] collections were some of the first titles to be digitally restored. At the moment, as many as eighty Blu-Ray titles are being released on a weekly basis[v] – some of which are digitally restored back-catalog titles, and others are recent theatrical releases filmed using 4K digital cameras.  It has become standard practice to scan and digitally restore old film masters to 4K, then transcode or downres[vi] the frames for distribution to DVD (standard definition, SD) and Blu-Ray (high definition, HD). For the time being consumers are not aware of an existing 4K version of these titles, nor have access to them. But when the time comes for studios to release their catalogues in 4K, they will have a relatively easy task to prepare them for public distribution.

It’s worth pointing out that the presentation of these 4K digital restorations are inevitably better than when they were originally premiered in movie theater decades earlier – A time of sub-standard lens optics (from today’s vantage point), and were scratches and pops on analog film reels was considered the norm.

Figure iv - RED One 4K (left) & Epic 5K (right) Digital Cinema Cameras

Figure iv – RED One 4K (left) & Epic 5K (right) Digital Cinema Cameras

Restoration aside, movie production using native 4K digital cameras was introduced long ago by RED Digital Cinema[vii] – first with their RED One[viii] in 2007, and then with the RED Epic[ix] in 2010 supporting 5K (5120×2700) resolution. Founding member and first employee of RED, Ted Schilowitz commented at NAB ’13 In Las Vegas, “Since we introduced RED back in NAB ’07, thousands of movies have been filmed using our cameras. And it’s not just Hollywood that’s into 4K and 5K production – international studios, and enterprises have joined in as well.”

Figure v – RED Dragon 6K sensors scheduled for upgrade, at NAB ’13 in Las Vegas

Figure v – RED Dragon 6K sensors scheduled for upgrade, at NAB ’13 in Las Vegas

RED continues to lead the market with their introduction of the RED Dragon, announced on the 8th of April, 2013. This new sensor extends their Mysterium® range to 6K – a sensor that supports 6144×3160 – and has an equivalent resolution to a 19 megapixel camera. The Dragon far exceeds the pixel density of any competing 4K camera from competitors[xi] that have recently entered into the UHD production space. Sony is also fighting for market share, with the introduction of their F65[xii], claiming an 8K sensor, although the true pixel count is measured around 5782 x 3060[xiii] (or over 17 million pixels – thus closer to 6K resolution).

Graphic - Building a Case for 4K (v.1. The last thing Hollywood needs is pirated 4K content

Crossing the 4K Chasm

Likely the first 4K experience for consumers has already been – or soon will be – at the cinema. Although most theaters are outfitted with digital projectors using 2K (2048 × 1080)[xiv], they are steadily upgrading to 4K. As the ultra-high definition experience becomes ubiquitous in theaters, movies produced in UHD will be projected[xv] natively, without any reduction or compromises in pixel resolution.

The distribution of 4K content to theaters is an ongoing challenge. With the shadow of piracy looming, content needs to be delivered such that the following contingencies are addressed:

  • Content Delivery – As the Internet becomes the vehicle to distribute movies to selected cinemas, the appropriate DRM (Digital Rights Management) and encryption mechanisms need to protect the content.
  • Content Storage – Distributed 4K films require tamper-proof hardware to ensure that content is securely protected while at rest.
  • Content Rights – Centrally established usage policies are needed so that movies are projected at authorized times, and aptly expire – as authorized by the content distributors.
  • Content Quality – Maintaining consistency in quality through the use of industry certified projectors, screens, optics, and audio quality is essential to ensuring uniformity in the 4K cinema experience. Using the recently ratified H.265 standard will maintain efficiency in file size and bandwidth, while maximizing video quality.
Figure vi – Penetration of Selected Audio & Video Technologies in U.S. Households since 1981

Figure vi – Penetration of Selected Audio & Video Technologies in U.S. Households since 1981

Finally, it’s worth mentioning the anticipated rate of market adoption of 4K when compared to previous technologies. Studies show that the rate of adoption is increasing with every new technology. The CD[xvii], took 16 years to reach 70% penetration in U.S. households[xviii]. It then took six years to reach the same adoption for DVD[xix] (introduced in 1998)[xx]. HD Television has grown at a similar pace, fuelling Blu-Ray sale in the process. By chance or design as each technology reached 70% penetration, a new format was introduced to consumers (Figure vi). Interestingly, none of the past four recessions adversely affected adoption of these technologies[xxi]. With the introduction of 4K televisions in 2013, it is entirely feasible for 4K to reach similar adoption rates by the end of this decade.

Graphic - Building a Case for 4K (v.2. Most certainly, when our walls become gigantic TV monitors

Before consumers benefit from 4K, its successor is already being showcased. 8K[i] supports resolution up to 7680×4320, and has already been demonstrated by NHK[ii], Japan’s public broadcasting organization[iii]. 8K is essentially equivalent to viewing every single frame in the video at the resolution of a 33 megapixel camera.

When 4K eventually arrives to the living room, consumers will turn their attention to 8K and beyond. HD will be relegated to history class, and on display at the local technology museum.

 

Read Additional Articles in this Series

I. Consumption is Personal

In the days of linear television, broadcasters had a difficult task in understanding their audience. Without a direct broadcasting and feedback mechanism like the Internet, gauging subscriber behavior was slow. Today, online video providers have the ability to conduct a one-to-one conversation with their audience. Viewing habits of consumers will continue to rapidly change in the next ten years. This will require changes in advertising expenditure and tactics.

II. Granularity of Choice

The evolution from traditional TV viewing to online video has been swift. This has significantly disrupted disc sales such as DVD and Blu-Ray, as well as cable and satellite TV subscriptions. With the newfound ability to consume content anytime, anywhere, and on any device, consumers are re-evaluating their spending habits. In this paper we will discuss these changes in buying behavior, and identify the turning point of these changes.

III. Benchmarking the H.265 Video Experience

Transcoding large video libraries is a time consuming and expensive process. Maintaining consistency in video quality helps to ensure that storage costs and bandwidth are used efficiently. It is also important for video administrators to understand the types of devices receiving the video so that subscribers can enjoy an optimal viewing experience. This paper discusses the differences in quality in popular video codecs, including the recently ratified H.265 specification.

IV. Search & Discovery Is a Journey, not a Destination

Television subscribers have come a long way from the days of channel hopping. The arduous days of struggling to find something entertaining to watch are now behind us. As consumers look to the future, the ability to search for related interests and discover new interests is now established as common practice. This paper discusses the challenges that search and discovery engines face in refining their services in order to serve a truly global audience.

V. Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation

Broadcasting, as a whole, is becoming less about big powerful hardware and more about software and services. As these players move to online video services, subscribers will benefit from the breadth of content they will provide to subscribers. As the world’s video content moves online, solution providers will contribute to the success of Internet video deployments. Support for future technologies such as 4K video, advancements in behavioral analytics, and accompanying processing and networking demands will follow. Migration to a multiscreen world requires thought leadership and forward-thinking partnerships to help clients keep pace with the rapid march of technology. This paper explores the challenges that solution providers will face in assisting curators of content to address their subscriber’s needs and changing market demands.

VI. Building a Case for 4K, Ultra High Definition Video

Ultra High Definition technology (UHD), or 4K, is the latest focus in the ecosystem of video consumption. For most consumers this advanced technology is considered out of their reach, if at all necessary. In actual fact, 4K is right around the corner and will be on consumer wish lists by the end of this decade. From movies filmed in 4K, to archive titles scanned in UHD, there is a tremendous library of content waiting to be released. Furthermore, today’s infrastructure is evolving and converging to meet the demands of 4K, including Internet bandwidth speeds, processing power, connectivity standards, and screen resolutions. This paper explores the next generation in video consumption and how 4K will stimulate the entertainment industry.

VII. Are You Ready For Social TV?

Social TV brings viewers to content via effective brand management and social networking. Users recommend content as they consume it, consumers actively follow what others are watching, and trends drive viewers to subject matters of related interests. The integration of Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and other social networks has become a natural part of program creation and the engagement of the viewing community. Social networks create an environment where broadcasters have unlimited power to work with niche groups without geographic limits. The only limitations are those dictated by content owners and their associated content rights, as well as those entrenched in corporate culture who are preventing broadcasters from evolving into a New Media world.

VIII. Turning Piratez into Consumers

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, I

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, II

X. Turning Piratez into Consumers, III

XI. Turning Piratez into Consumers, IV

XII. Turning Piratez into Consumers, V

Content Protection is a risk-to-cost balance. At the moment, the cost of piracy is low and the risk is low. There are no silver bullets to solving piracy, but steps can be taken to reduce levels to something more acceptable. It is untrue that everyone who pirates would be unwilling to buy the product legally. It is equally evident that every pirated copy does not represent a lost sale. If the risk is too high and the cost is set correctly, then fewer people will steal content. This paper explores how piracy has evolved over the past decades, and investigates issues surrounding copyright infringement in the entertainment industry.

About the Author

Home - Signature, Gabriel Dusil ('12, shadow, teal)Gabriel Dusil was recently the Chief Marketing & Corporate Strategy Officer at Visual Unity, with a mandate to advance the company’s portfolio into next generation solutions and expand the company’s global presence. Before joining Visual Unity, Gabriel was the VP of Sales & Marketing at Cognitive Security, and Director of Alliances at SecureWorks, responsible for partners in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Previously, Gabriel worked at VeriSign & Motorola in a combination of senior marketing & sales roles. Gabriel obtained a degree in Engineering Physics from McMaster University, in Canada and has advanced knowledge in Online Video Solutions, Cloud Computing, Security as a Service (SaaS), Identity & Access Management (IAM), and Managed Security Services (MSS).

All Rights Reserved

©2013, All information in this document is the sole ownership of the author. This document and any of its parts should not be copied, stored in the document system or transferred in any way including, but not limited to electronic, mechanical, photographs, or any other record, or otherwise published or provided to the third party without previous express written consent of the author. Certain terms used in this document could be registered trademarks or business trademarks, which are in sole ownership of its owners.

Tags

Connected TV, Digital Video, Online Video, Gabriel Dusil, Internet Video, Broadcast, Linear Broadcast, Multi-screen, Multiscreen, New Media, Online Video Platform, OTT, Over the Top Content, OVP, Smart TV, Social TV, Visual Unity, UHD, H.265, H.264, Ultra HD, 4K, 8K, 16K, NHK, RED Epic, RED Dragon, RED One, Sony F65, Canon EOS C500, Mysterium, OLED, HDMI, CES, Consumer Electronics Show, IMAX, HEVC, High Efficiency Video Coding, flexible display, IMAX

[i] “Everything I Need to Know About Flexible e-paper”, by Green Diary, http://www.greendiary.com/flexible-paper.html

[iii] Walt Disney Company, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney

[vi] Downresing – reducing a video’s resolution – such as from HD to SD.

[vii] RED Digital Cinema Camera Company, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Epic#Epic

[x] “To the annoyance of collectors that replaced their DVD’s with Blu-Rays … 4K will make these collections obsolete in one fell-swoop. Such is progress.”

[xi] Canon (EOS C500 and 1D C, EOS cameras, http://cinemaeos.usa.canon.com/products.php?type=Cameras

[xiii] “Sony’s F65 Actually Has a 6k Sensor”, by Justin O’Neill, RoyalGalactic, http://camerarentalz.com/sony-f65-6k-sensor/

[xvi] “The last thing Hollywood needs is pirated 4K content … downloadable even before a film reaches the theaters.”

[xvii] Compact Disc, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD

[xviii] “Penetration of Media Devices in U.S. Homes”, Nielsen Media Research’s Home Technology Report, http://www.nielsen.com, “TV Basics”, Television Bureau of Advertising, Inc., June 2012, http://www.tvb.org/media/file/TV_Basics.pdf

[xx] Blu-ray Disc, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-Ray

[xxi] List of recessions in the United States, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States

[xxii] “Most certainly, when our walls become gigantic TV monitors … then HD will be passé, and enthusiasts will be demanding even higher resolutions.”

[xxv] “8K UHDTV: How do you send a 48Gbps TV signal over terrestrial airwaves?”, by Sebastian Anthony, ExtremeTech, 4th June 2012, http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/130238-8k-uhdtv-how-do-you-send-a-48gbps-tv-signal-over-terrestrial-airwaves

OTT & Multiscreen • Digital Video Series • 5 • Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation

2013 June 24 / / 13 Comments

Graphic - Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation (title, web]

Broadcast for the Digital Generation

The multiscreen experience has significantly widened the choice for how subscribers receive their content. The living room television is no longer the only lean-back experience – tablets and mobiles also offer a unique approach to viewing content. Internet video introduced the notion that self-produced short-form videos[1] (less than 10 minutes), are not just a fad but an alternate form of entertainment[2]. Whether short-form or long-form, it is no longer necessary to buy video in excess of what is consumed – subscribers now have the ability to obtain exactly what they want, thanks in part to multiscreen viewing.

Figure i – Comparing the Multiscreen viewing Experience

In the foreseeable future online video is expected to dominate the daily consumption of content. But the predictions of a broadcast demise due to multiscreen, have been exaggerated. Consumers are increasing their viewing experience with alternate online offerings such as YouTube[3], Netflix[4], and Hulu[5]. In spite of recent studies, habits have not changed significantly from traditional TV viewing[6]. A recent study by Ericsson (Figure ii) shows that consumers are migrating from a passive viewer to an active user state, where new services are being offered on demand, onto multiple screens[7]. In any case, as indicated by this study, although there is a steady shift towards internet video, linear television[8] still maintains a key position in the viewing habits of subscribers.

Figure ii - Average Viewing per Device across 12 Markets

Figure ii – Average Viewing per Device across 12 Markets

Furthermore, the television industry is forecasted to maintain healthy growth amid a rapid rise in competing online video solutions. One metric for measuring the broadcast business is in the analysis of advertising[9] revenue. As shown in Figure iv, ads for local television stations experienced a dip from 2006 to 2009, however there has been a steady rise since. Even if growth is in single digits, it is growth nonetheless. Traditional television revenue growth continues to show a stable and upward trend[13].

Figure iii - Time Spent Viewing per day, by Type[20]

Figure iii – Time Spent Viewing per day, by Type[20]

Nevertheless, some media still portray the state of linear broadcast (aka. live television)[11] as steadily dying, in contrast to the growth in online video. Some even predict the demise of television to echo the fate of newspapers[12]. Just google, “death of broadcast television” to see the latest dire opinions of journalists.  The origin of TV’s demise are rooted in recent subscriber trend reports.  For example, Alcatel Lucent Bell Labs[28] predicts that by 2020, only 10% of viewing in the U.S. will be via linear TV, compared to 48% in 2012. Almost 50% of video will be consumed using OTT (Over-the-top content)[29] by the end of this decade, and another 33% will be using VoD services. Additionally, daily viewing is expected to increase from 4.8 hours per day in 2012 to seven hours per day in the next eight years. This change will be driven by a twelve fold increase in internet video content, according to the study.

Graphic - Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation (iv. Television Station Advertising Revenue Forecast]

Figure iv – Television Station Advertising Revenue Forecast

 

Broadcasters continue to be the Ocean Liners of this market[14] – not just because they are huge and have the most money to spend, but because they know their viewers well and are still the flagships of video monetization. Ultimately, broadcasters are in an excellent position to capitalize on the current evolution of subscriber behavior. However, as with most new technologies there are big boats, well-funded, directed with huge capacity.  Then there are smaller faster and flexible boats, able to quickly address what the big guys have missed (or maybe even fast enough to grab some clients before the bigger boats hit port). Compared to the traditional broadcast industry – which is over 60 years old – online video has only recently entered into the mind-share of consumers[15]. With so many suppliers[16] vying for market share one could infer that this suggests a young market that promises growth and eventually consolidation[17].with the ocean liners steadily incorporating and mimicking the activities of the smaller, faster players.

Graphic - Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation (iii.a. Internet video services may be viewed as disruptive to traditional television ...

For these ocean liners to survive in a multiscreen world, consolidation will occur, and take shape in many forms.  One may be Telco providers acquiring video platforms to complement their service portfolio. After all, Telcos and content delivery network (CDN[18]) operators are responsible for supplying video traffic reliability to their subscribers. Their services are easily complemented by offering cloud-based video to host all of that content. A recent example of this is the acquisition of Delve by the CDN provider Limelight[19]. Another example are design and build video solution providers that will continue to seek partnerships to widen their geographic reach – resulting in cross-sell[21] and up-sell[22] opportunities.

In addition, equipment manufacturers offering partial solutions to an OVP (Online Video Platform[23]) infrastructure will acquire suppliers to complete their product offering. Still other companies may acquire for the purposes of building Intellectual Property[24] assets to increase their opportunity footprint.

This multiscreen ocean is certainly big enough to accommodate boats of all sizes and shapes.

Analog Dollars to Digital Gold

The economic climate over the past few years has been a wake-up call for broadcasters[25] looking to streamline their workflow and cut costs. This has helped drive a migration to digitization and then logically extend their libraries to internet video services. This can significantly lower costs compared to expensive hardware-based broadcast equipment, and becomes a necessary foundation for multiscreen video consumption.

So, despite budget cutbacks in ICT[26], consumer demand has helped push the migration of investments to online video, and build these new infrastructures. Throughout the latest economic down-turn, the need for multiscreen solution providers remains strong. This is largely due to the requirement of migrating legacy-based tape systems to an internet-based file system. All of these changes require expertise in both traditional and new disciplines. As common sense dictates; the better a supplier speaks the language of the client, the higher the chances of a successful installation.  It follows that suppliers with a background in both traditional video and new media[27] video will prove to be the most successful players.

The recent recession has not affected all regions equally. Emerging, dynamic markets such as Central & Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East and South-East Asia have been a blessing to solution providers operating internationally. Although budgets are typically smaller in these emerging markets, the sheer quantity of projects is a boon to suppliers trying to maintain healthy revenue streams. In some cases these new technology investments allow these markets to leap-frog western counterparts.

So how will the traditional broadcast industry adapt and overcome these rapid changes in subscriber behavior? Well, it certainly won’t happen overnight. But speed, agility and sheer will are necessary to survive and thrive amid evolutionary changes. The digital video world is no exception. Curators of content – those who produce, own, or distribute video – are perfectly positioned to capitalize on this massive market growth – Both in the use of multiple screens, and in the increased duration that subscribers are watching video.

Building the Foundation

A main component of revenue success in multiscreen services is to offer solutions that are flexible, modular, and scalable.  This forms the critical paths to building modern platforms that can accommodate a plethora of back-end infrastructures, while maintaining a sense of continuity. The project needs to be considered as an ever-evolving solution, as opposed to a one-off product. A well maintained and updated platform will translate into happy subscribers, and provide a foundation for geographic reach.

On a functional level, online video services require innovation excellence, in areas such as:

  • Analytics & Reporting – Cross-platform subscription services require constant refinement to maximize revenue potential. Monitoring and assessing the intricacies of user behavior should translate into continual improvements in the user experience. Increased subscriber satisfaction then leads to maximizing revenue potential.
  • Search & Discovery – These algorithms need to juggle a complex set of search results that offer accurate suggestions in real-time. Search results should be correlated across collaborative, statistical, social, and behavioral engines.
  • Development Portability – ensuring that multiscreen software development can be usable on as many devices and operating systems, as possible.
  • DRM[30] Interoperability – Support for multiple DRM standards that seamlessly cohabitate. At the top of this content protection pyramid is PlayReady[31] from Microsoft, FairPlay[32] from Apple, Verimatrix and more recently, UltraViolet[33] which is backed by a consortium of over 70 corporations. Future online video services should anticipate support for heterogeneous DRM environments.
  • Automated end-to-end Workflow – Ensuring that tasks from live broadcasts or VoD (Video On Demand)[34] to multiscreen playout are streamlined, and converge on real-time service delivery.
  • Multiscreen Development Excellence – Maintaining a high quality and consistent video experience across as many consumer devices as possible.

Internet video solutions should be capable of integrating into existing hardware and broadcast workflows without overly taxing the corporate culture. For broadcasters, the ability to tie seamlessly into established operational processes is a strong value-add, and in some cases essential. A robust offering also needs to accommodate new-entrants into the video delivery market that do not have any legacy constraints.

Figure v – Solution Selling Principles for OTT & Multiscreen - From Business Needs to Implementation

Figure v – Solution Selling Principles for OTT & Multiscreen – From Business Needs to Implementation

Proposals that realize these goals start from the framework of understanding the client’s overall business objectives and then take a strategic approach with the client, rather than reacting to a single tactical request,. Much larger business opportunities are uncovered and a competent supplier’s profile is raised from a basic reseller to a trusted adviser.

Preparing a solution begins with understanding the client’s pains and/or needs. This may be in the form of organizational inefficiency, competitive threats, or not capitalizing on new revenue potential. A strategy can then be developed to address these business challenges. Strategic decisions filter down to departmental objectives and into individual actions. Solution selling leads to the building block of People, Process, and Technology, whereby:

  • Technological components consist of a bill-of-materials, including various software and hardware that may spread across an eco-system of suppliers.
  • From People disseminates knowledge and expertise and forms the basis of a provider’s reputation
  • The overall Proposal consists of designing, building and supporting the solution.
Figure vi – Digital Video Workflow from Creation, Ingestion, & Management, to Delivery & Consumption

Figure vi – Digital Video Workflow from Creation, Ingestion, &
Management, to Delivery & Consumption

In combination, these components fulfill the client’s strategic vision as the project migrates to the implementation stage. Still, the project should not be considered a one-off implementation, but rather an organic infrastructure, synchronized with revenue growth and client expectations.

Software, Platforms, & Infrastructure

Graphic - Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation (v.a. Internet video is not replacing broadcast television ...It is just giving subscribers another choice in how to watch their content)

An important solution for delivering multiscreen internet video is utilizing a PaaS[35] (Platform as a Service) and SaaS[36] (Software as a Service) offering. These cloud-based services provide content owners and distributors with a quick time-to-market.  Comparatively, designing and building a proprietary online video platform takes several years, and may still not match the functionality, resilience, and longevity of a commercial grade platform. In a digital video context, the difference between SaaS and PaaS is that SaaS is mainly positioned as an entry-level service, for companies with a limited amount of premium content. This is where most OVP vendors concentrate their efforts. A SaaS-based service manages video content in the cloud, and the client uses a portal interface to manage their subscribers. This is often an off-the-shelf service, with minimal flexibility in workflow, accommodating legacy systems, or support for live content.

Figure vii – Online Video Market Opportunities

Figure vii – Online Video Market Opportunities

Conversely, PaaS is a complete platform solution approach. The cloud infrastructure is fully customizable in both hardware and software to suit the needs of the client. These solutions encompass a much larger infrastructure, defined in this case as OTT (Over the Top Content). OTT solutions are best delivered as an à la carte[38] service, giving clients the flexibility to run a more robust service, while not having the burden of hosting (and managing the entire infrastructure by themselves which entail higher capital and operating costs respectively).

Where OVP may service terabytes of storage, OTT services petabytes and exabytes of content.

Online Video Must Flow

Content management for multiscreen has special requirements in the cloud.  Compared to services that just involve document storage (i.e. without video, or other real-time multimedia), the keys to a successful video service are:  the ability to manage large bandwidth requirements, quality of service demands, and massive storage. Beyond these basics, there are distinct requirements for content protection, licensing, and monetization of assets. There is also a clear demarcation between managing VoD verses live content; VoD subscribers download stored files; Live content requires special real-time workflow considerations from ingest & transcoding, through to delivery & consumption.

Opportunities have not just come from traditional broadcasters. They come from new entrants as well – Companies that have no legacy issues, and want to build digital infrastructures and distribution models using the latest methodologies. Media brands, retailers, telcos and enterprises are all realizing that they have vast libraries of multimedia content that can be monetized given an affordable, easy to use and flexible platform (Figure vii). This brings awareness to traditional enterprises that an online video platform can be an excellent vehicle to promote their brand, and enhance their revenue streams.

With a proper architecture across all five stages – Creation, Ingestion, Management, Delivery, and Consumption (Figure vi) – Video service providers are able to monetize all of their content – not just what they feed into a live channel.

Graphic - Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation (vii.a. For video libraries currently unused or in limbo, an Online Video Platform can enable new revenue streams for these content owners)

OTT, OVP, represent tremendous revenue opportunities for network operators, media creators, owners and distributors of video content and, of course for enterprises in general. Wherever the client comes from, and however much video content they have, it can be consumed and monetized using OVP and OTT solutions using a PaaS or SaaS architecture.

Read Additional Articles in this Series

I. Consumption is Personal

In the days of linear television, broadcasters had a difficult task in understanding their audience. Without a direct broadcasting and feedback mechanism like the Internet, gauging subscriber behavior was slow. Today, online video providers have the ability to conduct a one-to-one conversation with their audience. Viewing habits of consumers will continue to rapidly change in the next ten years. This will require changes in advertising expenditure and tactics.

II. Granularity of Choice

The evolution from traditional TV viewing to online video has been swift. This has significantly disrupted disc sales such as DVD and Blu-Ray, as well as cable and satellite TV subscriptions. With the newfound ability to consume content anytime, anywhere, and on any device, consumers are re-evaluating their spending habits. In this paper we will discuss these changes in buying behavior, and identify the turning point of these changes.

III. Benchmarking the H.265 Video Experience

Transcoding large video libraries is a time consuming and expensive process. Maintaining consistency in video quality helps to ensure that storage costs and bandwidth are used efficiently. It is also important for video administrators to understand the types of devices receiving the video so that subscribers can enjoy an optimal viewing experience. This paper discusses the differences in quality in popular video codecs, including the recently ratified H.265 specification.

IV. Search & Discovery Is a Journey, not a Destination

Television subscribers have come a long way from the days of channel hopping. The arduous days of struggling to find something entertaining to watch are now behind us. As consumers look to the future, the ability to search for related interests and discover new interests is now established as common practice. This paper discusses the challenges that search and discovery engines face in refining their services in order to serve a truly global audience.

V. Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation

Broadcasting, as a whole, is becoming less about big powerful hardware and more about software and services. As these players move to online video services, subscribers will benefit from the breadth of content they will provide to subscribers. As the world’s video content moves online, solution providers will contribute to the success of Internet video deployments. Support for future technologies such as 4K video, advancements in behavioral analytics, and accompanying processing and networking demands will follow. Migration to a multiscreen world requires thought leadership and forward-thinking partnerships to help clients keep pace with the rapid march of technology. This paper explores the challenges that solution providers will face in assisting curators of content to address their subscriber’s needs and changing market demands.

VI. Building a Case for 4K, Ultra High Definition Video

Ultra High Definition technology (UHD), or 4K, is the latest focus in the ecosystem of video consumption. For most consumers this advanced technology is considered out of their reach, if at all necessary. In actual fact, 4K is right around the corner and will be on consumer wish lists by the end of this decade. From movies filmed in 4K, to archive titles scanned in UHD, there is a tremendous library of content waiting to be released. Furthermore, today’s infrastructure is evolving and converging to meet the demands of 4K, including Internet bandwidth speeds, processing power, connectivity standards, and screen resolutions. This paper explores the next generation in video consumption and how 4K will stimulate the entertainment industry.

VII. Are You Ready For Social TV?

Social TV brings viewers to content via effective brand management and social networking. Users recommend content as they consume it, consumers actively follow what others are watching, and trends drive viewers to subject matters of related interests. The integration of Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and other social networks has become a natural part of program creation and the engagement of the viewing community. Social networks create an environment where broadcasters have unlimited power to work with niche groups without geographic limits. The only limitations are those dictated by content owners and their associated content rights, as well as those entrenched in corporate culture who are preventing broadcasters from evolving into a New Media world.

VIII. Turning Piratez into Consumers

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, I

IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, II

X. Turning Piratez into Consumers, III

XI. Turning Piratez into Consumers, IV

XII. Turning Piratez into Consumers, V

Content Protection is a risk-to-cost balance. At the moment, the cost of piracy is low and the risk is low. There are no silver bullets to solving piracy, but steps can be taken to reduce levels to something more acceptable. It is untrue that everyone who pirates would be unwilling to buy the product legally. It is equally evident that every pirated copy does not represent a lost sale. If the risk is too high and the cost is set correctly, then fewer people will steal content. This paper explores how piracy has evolved over the past decades, and investigates issues surrounding copyright infringement in the entertainment industry.

y.

About the Author

Home - Signature, Gabriel Dusil ('12, shadow, teal)Gabriel Dusil was recently the Chief Marketing & Corporate Strategy Officer at Visual Unity, with a mandate to advance the company’s portfolio into next generation solutions and expand the company’s global presence. Before joining Visual Unity, Gabriel was the VP of Sales & Marketing at Cognitive Security, and Director of Alliances at SecureWorks, responsible for partners in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Previously, Gabriel worked at VeriSign & Motorola in a combination of senior marketing & sales roles. Gabriel obtained a degree in Engineering Physics from McMaster University, in Canada and has advanced knowledge in Online Video Solutions, Cloud Computing, Security as a Service (SaaS), Identity & Access Management (IAM), and Managed Security Services (MSS).

All Rights Reserved

©2013, All information in this document is the sole ownership of the author. This document and any of its parts should not be copied, stored in the document system or transferred in any way including, but not limited to electronic, mechanical, photographs, or any other record, or otherwise published or provided to the third party without previous express written consent of the author. Certain terms used in this document could be registered trademarks or business trademarks, which are in sole ownership of its owners.

Tags

Connected TV, Digital Video, Online Video, Gabriel Dusil, Internet Video, Broadcast, Linear Broadcast, Multi-screen, Multiscreen, New Media, Online Video Platform, OTT, Over the Top Content, OVP, Smart TV, Social TV, Visual Unity, DRM, Digital Rights Management, PaaS, Platform as a Service, SaaS, Software as a Service, Solution Selling, Search & Discovery

References

[1] “Why Short-Form Video Is The Future Of Marketing”, by Kerrin Sheldon, Fast Company, http://www.fastcompany.com/1843289/why-short-form-video-future-marketing

[6] “TV & Video, Changing the Game”, Ericsson, 2012,

[7] Google – New Multi-screen World (12.Aug), http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/multiscreenworld_final.pdf

[10] “Internet video services may be viewed as disruptive to traditional television … But it won’t be dethroning broadcast anytime soon.”

[12] “For Whom The Bell Tolls? It Tolls For TV…”, by Henry Blodget, Business Insider, http://www.businessinsider.com/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-it-tolls-for-tv-2012-10

[13] “Local TV Revenues Dropped in ’11, But Strong Rebound Forecast”, by MarketingCharts staff, 1st May 2012, http://www.marketingcharts.com/wp/television/local-tv-revenues-dropped-in-11-but-strong-rebound-forecast-21959/

[15] “Granularity of Choice”, by Gabriel Dusil, https://mykoddi.com/dusilcom/2013/04/01/granularity-of-choice/

[16] “Online Video Provider (OVP) List “,Curated by @zbutcher, http://www.scoop.it/t/online-video-provider-ovp-list

[18] CDN, Content delivery network, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network

[19] “Limelight Acquires Delve Networks For Enterprise Video Management: Value $10M”, by Dan Rayburn, http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2010/08/limelight-acquires-delve-networks-for-enterprise-video-management-value-10m.html

[23] “Online Video Provider (OVP) List “,Curated by @zbutcher, http://www.scoop.it/t/online-video-provider-ovp-list

[24] Intellectual Property, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property

[26] Information Communication Technology

[29] Over-the-top content, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over-the-top_content

[31] Play Ready DRM, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayReady

[34] Video On Demand, VoD, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_on_demand

[35] Platform as a Service, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PaaS

[36] Software as a Service, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SaaS

[37] “Internet video is not replacing broadcast television … It is just giving subscribers another choice in
how to watch their content.”.”

[39] “For video libraries currently unused or in limbo,
an Online Video Platform can enable new revenue streams for these content owners.”

OTT & Multiscreen • OTT & New Media Market Opportunities

2013 June 17 / / 0 Comments

Graphic - OTT & New Media Opportunities (title)

Synopsis

The era of multiscreen video has begun. Portability and connectivity are changing the video landscape. TV everywhere and other multiscreen initiatives are fundamentally changing the entertainment business model, with apps streaming live to TVs, computers, tablets, and mobile phones. According to the latest forecasts from Informa, the global online-video market will be worth $37 billion in 2017, driven by the popularity of OTT (Over the Top services).  Broadcasters, content owners, and distributors must engage multiscreen delivery to survive. This presentation explores these market trends, and integrated solutions that bridge the gap between the broadcast world and multiscreen consumption.

Download the Original Presentation here:

Management – Visual Unity (OTT & New Media Opportunities ’13, v4.9).pptx

View the PDF version here:

 [slideshare id=23109144&sc=no]

OTT & Multiscreen • Digital Video Series • 4 • Search and Discovery Is a Journey, not a Destination

2013 May 13 / / 13 Comments

Graphic - Search & Discovery is a Journey (title)

Searching for content has significantly evolved in the past ten years, thanks largely to Google[1]. Consumers don’t even realize how much things have changed, and how fast we can find what we’re looking for. Those that are old enough to remember the 80’s TV experience or earlier, discovering new content was reliant on commercial previews to entice us to watch up-and-coming programs. The popularity of TV Guide[2] helped untether viewers from these teasers, and allowed searching for future programming schedules in a magazine format.

Graphic - Search & Discovery is a Journey (i.a. Why should I memorize something)

Regardless, tuning into broadcast TV was restricted to watching specific channels, during specific timeslots. Viewers needed to reserve that window in their daily schedule. Prime time[4] (between 8pm and 10pm) was established as the most lucrative timeslot in a channel’s 24 hour transmission. Broadcasters faced the constant challenge of juggling their content to optimal times, to suit the target audience – a practice that continues today.

The electronic programming guide (EPG[5]) gained traction throughout the 90’s and became a modern attempt to discover new interests. Instead of browsing a week’s programing in paper format, subscribers were doing so on the lower third[6] of their TV monitors. Although the notion of searching was still out of reach – especially in the context that consumers are familiar with today. EPG did not meet the depth of search sophistication that is expected in today’s digital generation. It also lacks modern search features that subscribers expect, such as content suggestions or peer-based recommendations.

Figure i - From Channel Clicking to “Googling”

Figure i – From Channel Clicking to “Googling”

The linear experience in TV broadcasting can be directly compared to how the PC experience entered the lives of consumers. When computers first came into the home, PC’s were arranged similar to television programs – in directories (akin to TV channels),and files (TV episodes) – albeit with greater flexibility and deeper tree structures.

Google helped fix that problem by significantly improving the search paradigm (hoping to remind us of how effective their algorithms are, Google always displays the duration of your search. Who isn’t impressed with 1.5 million hits in 0.2 seconds?) This approach led to software that would achieve similar search speed, accuracy, and ease of use on the PC. Users no longer had to remember where they put their files. All that was needed was to remember a word, or phrase that was used inside the document, and to a good level of confidence, the file would be found. The proficiency that web surfer’s achieved from googling[9], translated to the desktop. Gradually there was no longer a need for all those directories. The organization of digital lives changed from endlessly moving files around the computer, to ensuring they had meaningful file names and metadata[10] so that they could be easily searchable. Whether files were in one directory or one hundred, they could be found just as quickly.

Figure ii - Evolution of Video Consumption

Figure ii – Evolution of Video Consumption

Fast forward to today, and files have grown in size, quantity and frequency that are orders of magnitude higher than ten years ago. Content is accessible at any time anywhere, and on any device. Computers now consist of multimedia libraries – images, music, and videos. The need for metadata is even more important for these files because there is no inherent text from which to catalog them. Metadata comes in two forms:

  • Structural – For photos this may be the time-stamp of the photo, exposure, shutter speed, or geolocation where it was taken. For a video or audio file this may include the bitrate, overall duration, and compression codec used.
  • Descriptive – For photos this may include the names of people in the images, and the event being photographed, For music this would include the artist, song, and album titles. Or for movies this may include the actors, directors, and producers of the title. IMDB[11] (Internet Movie Database) is a good example of descriptive metadata for movie titles.

This embedded metadata forms the index needed to find multimedia files that do not have a textual base.

Search & discovery is now an industry in itself fueling its own revenue streams. Users can now discover interests which were previously inaccessible. Operating systems have followed suit. For example, modern iterations of Microsoft Windows 8[12] and Apple iOS[13] have a relatively flat structure from a user perspective. Programs are now accessible from the home screen or adjacent screens that are a swipe away. Deep directories and file structures are still there, but hidden behind an elegant front-end. Digging deep into our memories and remembering where we put something is now archaic.

Figure iii – The Challenges of Search & Discovery

Figure iii – The Challenges of Search & Discovery

To better understand the evolution of search, and the consumption of video we need to start with an understanding of user behavior. Subscriber needs have evolved to a more complex set of search parameters. These engines now juggle a dense set of algorithms to present results that appease the consumer’s behavior. To do this, multiple algorithms are at play:

  • Collaborative Behaviour[14] compares the subscriber’s past behaviour with other subscribers with similar activities, and clusters similar interests. In other words, users that liked Lord of the Rings[15] also liked Batman, the Dark Knight [16].
  • Content Based search ties related content together. If a user likes the director, Peter Jackson[17], then they may like the movie, King Kong[18], which he directed.
  • Recommendation engine[19] which takes behaviour to a more proactive model by asking subscribers for their opinion, then presenting their collective user ratings.
  • Statistical searches display cumulative totals, such as the number of views, Like’s or the amount of reviewers – suggesting a level of popularity for that content.
Figure iv - Collaborative Search Engine clusters

Figure iv – Collaborative Search Engine clusters

Due to the global nature of a video subscription service, a subscriber should be presented with search results that are relevant to their geolocation[21]. They also should not be bombarded with irrelevant or inaccurate results that cannot be monetized due to restrictions in rights management, censorship, or DRM[22] (digital rights management). This applies to any associated advertisements as well. In the same spirit as Google’s “Do You Feel Lucky”, subscribers want search results that are immediately relevant. Challenges facing modern search engines include:

  • Demographics and Culture add their own level of search complexity, as results are altered due to a content rights or censorship. Results may be filtered or not shown at all.
  • Advertisers also want to have their brands shown prominently – Whether it’s on a mobile, tablet, TV, or laptop – and have their products displayed adjusted to content that complements their brand.

This leads to a wider discussion is on the rights to censor results, freedom of speech, and the manipulation of search results to suit big brother[23]. How much leeway should be allowed in order to control search results in the presence of sponsors, political influences, media brands or internet governance?

Online search algorithms continue to face the challenge of increased accuracy. In the pursuit of excellence, Netflix ran an open contest in October 2006, to improve their collaborative filtering algorithm. The competition was awarded in September 2009 for 1 million US$ to BellKor’s Pragmatic Chaos[24] which improved the accuracy of the Netflix algorithm by 10.06%., After thousands of man-hours, the algorithm was never implemented, due mainly to the implementation costs involved, according to Netflix sources[25].

Search engines and their related services may already be considered a mature market but there is still room for improvement. Several online music services allow subscribers to find artists of similar interest through graphical means similar to collaborative engines[26]. Google recently enabled the ability to drag a photo onto their search bar so that similar images could be found[27]. IMDB has mapped 2.3 million titles. The value of monetizing such a database was recognized by Amazon.com, resulting in their acquisition of IMDB in 1998. The beneficiaries of these search and discovery improvements continue to be subscribers.

Graphic - Search & Discovery is a Journey (iv.a. If millions of people watched it, then I guess it must be good)

Future challenges include a continuing correlation of as may data points as available.  Then making sense of the results. How can peer suggestions correlate better with statistics, past viewing, and collaborative results? How can search data correlate better with purchase behavior, and the overall personal profile of the subscriber? How can video consumption map to musical or photographic interests? How can search better integrate with personal verses business interests? Could a discovery engine reach a level of sophistication that offers search suggestion better than a close friend?  Then again, would we want that level of intimacy with a computer algorithm?

This may be a lot of questions to ask at the end of an article, but isn’t that the foundation of search and discovery?

 

Read Additional Articles in this Series

  • I. Consumption is Personal

    In the days of linear television, broadcasters had a difficult task in understanding their audience. Without a direct broadcasting and feedback mechanism like the Internet, gauging subscriber behavior was slow. Today, online video providers have the ability to conduct a one-to-one conversation with their audience. Viewing habits of consumers will continue to rapidly change in the next ten years. This will require changes in advertising expenditure and tactics.

    II. Granularity of Choice

    The evolution from traditional TV viewing to online video has been swift. This has significantly disrupted disc sales such as DVD and Blu-Ray, as well as cable and satellite TV subscriptions. With the newfound ability to consume content anytime, anywhere, and on any device, consumers are re-evaluating their spending habits. In this paper we will discuss these changes in buying behavior, and identify the turning point of these changes.

    III. Benchmarking the H.265 Video Experience

    Transcoding large video libraries is a time consuming and expensive process. Maintaining consistency in video quality helps to ensure that storage costs and bandwidth are used efficiently. It is also important for video administrators to understand the types of devices receiving the video so that subscribers can enjoy an optimal viewing experience. This paper discusses the differences in quality in popular video codecs, including the recently ratified H.265 specification.

    IV. Search & Discovery Is a Journey, not a Destination

    Television subscribers have come a long way from the days of channel hopping. The arduous days of struggling to find something entertaining to watch are now behind us. As consumers look to the future, the ability to search for related interests and discover new interests is now established as common practice. This paper discusses the challenges that search and discovery engines face in refining their services in order to serve a truly global audience.

    V. Multiscreen Solutions for the Digital Generation

    Broadcasting, as a whole, is becoming less about big powerful hardware and more about software and services. As these players move to online video services, subscribers will benefit from the breadth of content they will provide to subscribers. As the world’s video content moves online, solution providers will contribute to the success of Internet video deployments. Support for future technologies such as 4K video, advancements in behavioral analytics, and accompanying processing and networking demands will follow. Migration to a multiscreen world requires thought leadership and forward-thinking partnerships to help clients keep pace with the rapid march of technology. This paper explores the challenges that solution providers will face in assisting curators of content to address their subscriber’s needs and changing market demands.

    VI. Building a Case for 4K, Ultra High Definition Video

    Ultra High Definition technology (UHD), or 4K, is the latest focus in the ecosystem of video consumption. For most consumers this advanced technology is considered out of their reach, if at all necessary. In actual fact, 4K is right around the corner and will be on consumer wish lists by the end of this decade. From movies filmed in 4K, to archive titles scanned in UHD, there is a tremendous library of content waiting to be released. Furthermore, today’s infrastructure is evolving and converging to meet the demands of 4K, including Internet bandwidth speeds, processing power, connectivity standards, and screen resolutions. This paper explores the next generation in video consumption and how 4K will stimulate the entertainment industry.

    VII. Are You Ready For Social TV?

    Social TV brings viewers to content via effective brand management and social networking. Users recommend content as they consume it, consumers actively follow what others are watching, and trends drive viewers to subject matters of related interests. The integration of Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and other social networks has become a natural part of program creation and the engagement of the viewing community. Social networks create an environment where broadcasters have unlimited power to work with niche groups without geographic limits. The only limitations are those dictated by content owners and their associated content rights, as well as those entrenched in corporate culture who are preventing broadcasters from evolving into a New Media world.

    VIII. Turning Piratez into Consumers

    IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, I

    IX. Turning Piratez into Consumers, II

    X. Turning Piratez into Consumers, III

    XI. Turning Piratez into Consumers, IV

    XII. Turning Piratez into Consumers, V

Content Protection is a risk-to-cost balance. At the moment, the cost of piracy is low and the risk is low. There are no silver bullets to solving piracy, but steps can be taken to reduce levels to something more acceptable. It is untrue that everyone who pirates would be unwilling to buy the product legally. It is equally evident that every pirated copy does not represent a lost sale. If the risk is too high and the cost is set correctly, then fewer people will steal content. This paper explores how piracy has evolved over the past decades, and investigates issues surrounding copyright infringement in the entertainment industry.

About the Author

Home - Signature, Gabriel Dusil ('12, shadow, teal)Gabriel Dusil was recently the Chief Marketing & Corporate Strategy Officer at Visual Unity, with a mandate to advance the company’s portfolio into next generation solutions and expand the company’s global presence. Before joining Visual Unity, Gabriel was the VP of Sales & Marketing at Cognitive Security, and Director of Alliances at SecureWorks, responsible for partners in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Previously, Gabriel worked at VeriSign & Motorola in a combination of senior marketing & sales roles. Gabriel obtained a degree in Engineering Physics from McMaster University, in Canada and has advanced knowledge in Online Video Solutions, Cloud Computing, Security as a Service (SaaS), Identity & Access Management (IAM), and Managed Security Services (MSS).

All Rights Reserved

©2013, All information in this document is the sole ownership of the author. This document and any of its parts should not be copied, stored in the document system or transferred in any way including, but not limited to electronic, mechanical, photographs, or any other record, or otherwise published or provided to the third party without previous express written consent of the author. Certain terms used in this document could be registered trademarks or business trademarks, which are in sole ownership of its owners.

Tags

Connected TV, Digital Video, Gabriel Dusil, Internet Video, Linear Broadcast, Linear TV, Multi-screen, Multiscreen, New Media, Online Video Platform, OTT, Over the Top Content, OVP, Search & Discovery, Search and Discovery, second screen, Smart TV, Social TV, Visual Unity

References

[3] “Why should I memorize something when I know where to find it?”, Albert Einstein

[5][5] Electronic program guide, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPG

[7] Folder (computing), Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folder_(computing)

[9] Google (verb), Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googling

[11] Internet Movie Database, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMDB

[12] Microsoft Windows 8, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_8

[14] Collaborative search engine, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_search

[15] The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, New Line Cinema, ©2001, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120737/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

[16] Batman, the Dark Knight, Warner Bros., ©2002, http://www.imdb.com/company/co0026840/

[18] King Kong, Universal Pictures, , ©2005, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360717/

[19] Recommender system, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recommender_system

[20] “If millions of people watched it, then I guess it must be good?”

[25] “Remember Netflix’s $1m algorithm contest? Well, here’s why it didn’t use the winning entry”, by Paul Sawers, 13th April 2012, TNW, The Next Web http://thenextweb.com/media/2012/04/13/remember-netflixs-1m-algorithm-contest-well-heres-why-it-didnt-use-the-winning-entry/

OTT & Multiscreen – How Our Lives Will Change with Online Video, In the Next 10 Years

2013 May 1 / / 1 Comment

Management - Gabriel Dusil (Keynote, v1.5, How Online Video Will Change Our Lives in the Next 10 Years, title)

Synopsis

Online video providers today have the ability to experience a one-to-one conversation with their audience, compared to the somewhat anonymous nature of this relationship in traditional TV. Viewing habits of consumers continue to rapidly change in the next ten years, bringing more choice, portability and accessibility to video. A granular nature to analyzing subscriber behavior will open new opportunities for content owners, end users, and everyone in between. This will require accompanying changes in advertising expenditure as it pertains to a global vs. local focus.  In the global reach of video, due to the ubiquity of the Internet, online services will need optimize to capitalize on new market opportunities.

Watch a video of the Presentation here:

Download the Original Presentation here:

Portfolio – Visual Unity, Open Day, Prague (How Online Video Will Change Our Lives, ’13 v1.8).pptx

View the PDF version here:

http://www.slideshare.net/gdusil/portfolio-visual-unity-open-day-prague-how-online-video-will-change-our-lives-13-v18

[slideshare id=20314519&doc=portfolio-visualunityopendaypraguehowonlinevideowillchangeourlives13v1-8-130501031944-phpapp01]