Digital Trends Video Opinions • The 5-Foot Viewing Experience is a Missed Opportunity

Graphic - Digital Trends Video Opinions (header #2, web) The entertainment and computing industries differ in what is referred to as the two-foot versus ten-foot experience[i]: Users that are two feet away are typing away at their keyboard in front of their computers. When they’re ten feet away they’re watching movies or television. What if there was a new type of experience, based on an evolved viewing habit? What about a lean-back-feet-up experience, where the viewer is five feet from the screen? There are a growing number of users watching entertainment from tablets, mobiles, and computers. Some of those users don’t even have pay-TV anymore. They’re called cord-cutters[ii]. Display manufacturers haven’t yet targeted their products to fit the needs of these consumers. These are people that use their computer display like a TV, computer, and a communication platform – all in one. This is a missed opportunity. Let’s break down why. But before I get into it, let me explain my own setup. I don’t have a traditional living room where a TV sits at the epicenter and a sofa across from it. My living room consists of a computer and a monitor. It’s both my workplace and my place of entertainment. I have a relatively large 30″ monitor, so watching movies ten feet away on the sofa isn’t too bad, but it’s not ideal. I want to upgrade. But the product that I’m looking for doesn’t exist. I’m looking for a display that accommodates a five-foot experience – I want a 48” 4K monitor at 21:9 display aspect ratio[iii].

Why 4K?

Why should you invest in a 4K television if there’s no content? It’s the classic chicken and egg dilemma: Buy a 4K TV and wait for content, or wait for content first. Computer users don’t see it that way. They don’t see 4K technology as a TV but as a monitor. So what’s the difference? If the display is a TV, then it’s an entertainment vehicle. When consumers buy a TV with new technology such as HD, 3D, or 4K, they expect to use those features immediately. In the mid-2000s HD movies were promoted around the same time as HD televisions. Blu- ray discs began shipping in June 2006[iv], roughly the time that 1080p monitors were released. Despite only a few titles, there were enough of them to enticed early adopters. With 4K it’s different. There are no Blu-Ray 4K discs, there are no 4K movies for consumers, and TV stations aren’t broadcasting in 4K yet. Lacking content makes it seem like 4K has come to market too early. I write extensively about the readiness of 4K, “Building a Case for 4K, Ultra High Definition Video” [https://dusil.com/2013/07/15/building-a-case-for-4k-ultra-high-definition-video/]. From an entertainment perspective, the release of 4K TVs looks like an industry fail.

Figure i – Monitors are Windows to Applications

Figure i – Monitors are Windows to Applications & Services

On the flip side, computer enthusiasts strive for the fastest PCs, better efficiency, and greater productivity. For these users, a higher display resolution means more desktop real-estate – more windows, widgets, and icons. Higher resolutions beyond HD – some that are as high as UHD resolutions – are found already in monitors, tablets, and laptops. None of those consumers are complaining about the content. If the display is a monitor, then the argument about content is moot. As a monitor, the display is an interface to social media, games, productivity, videos, music, and communications (see Figure i). The big picture (pun intended) is that the computer monitor provides a window to connectivity, interactivity, and content – all in one.

Why 21:9?

Consumers have been primed for wider displays over many decades – from 4:3 in the middle of the last century, to the popularity of 16:9 at the tail end of the century. Wider screens eventually migrated from the cinema to the home. Today many movie lovers prefer the wider 21:9 screen[v] because it feels more immersive. With a large enough screen the movie begins to wrap around the viewer[vi]. Samsung’s curve[vii] strategy in their larger flat-screen displays capitalizes on that trend. For manufacturers, 21:9 is still quite new. Some displays are beginning to emerge at this aspect ratio, but haven’t yet grabbed enough consumer attention. This may be due to the fact that 21:9 is associated mainly with motion pictures. Case in point – In my video collection consists of around 40% of movies that were filmed at 2.35:1. 50% of them used 16:9 (or 1.85:1), and the remaining 10% – mainly older movies are in 4:3[viii]. So even in cinema, 21:9 doesn’t represent the overwhelming majority – at least in my collection. In television, nearly all programs are filmed in 16:9 displays, so this aspect ratio will likely remain the dominant champion in display technology for the majority of consumers. A UHD screen has a resolution of 3840×2160 – also called 2160p screens (taken from the 1080p nomenclature of HD TVs). A 21:9 screens could use a resolution of 3840×1648 UHD[ix]. This would result in an aspect ratio of 2.33:1, so movies filmed in 2.35:1 CinemaScope[x], or 2.39:1 would fit nicely.

Why 5-Feet?

Selling the notion of a five-foot experience requires an assessment of screen size versus viewing angle. There are varying opinions on what is considered comfortable to the viewer. SMPTE[xi] recommends no more than 30° horizontal from the viewer’s eyes to either side of the screen. Some retailers and manufacturers recommend anywhere between 28° and 36°[xii]. THX, on the other hand, considers a viewing angle as high as 40° (Figure ii).

Table 1 – Maximum Screen Size for a 40˚ Horizontal viewing angle

Table 1 – Maximum Screen Size for a 40˚ Horizontal viewing angle

When working two feet away on my 30” monitor, this results in a massive 55° viewing angle. I’m far exceeding the THX recommendation. But it’s not a problem. When I’m working on my computer my eyes are not trying to see the whole screen. I only need to focus on one desktop window at a time (such as when I’m typing this article). For computer users, their eyes only need to concentrate on the window that’s open, which only takes up part of the desktop. Therefore screen that exceeds the THX recommendation for home theatres, doesn’t apply to computer users. Still, it may explain why desktop display manufacturers are reluctant to make computer monitors larger than 34”. Table 1 shows the largest screen that could be accommodated if a 40° viewing angle is maintained at each distance. Leaning five feet back suggests a screen size of up to 48″. At 10 feet away, a much larger 95″ screen could grace the living room. Screen sizes are already approaching and surpassing 100”. Anything over 100″ is compelling for enthusiasts with larger living rooms or custom home theatres. 21:9 also helps with the vertical viewing angle. THX recommends that viewers should not tilt their eyes more than 15° from the horizontal[xiii]. As screens get larger, the vertically narrower 21:9 displays offer a more comfortable viewing angle.

Figure ii – 2 foot, 5 foot, & 10 foot viewing experience

Figure ii – 2 foot, 5-foot, & 10-foot viewing experiences

Want Versus Need

If 21:9 takes off, it will likely remain a niche product. Even as a niche play, it’s still a great differentiator for display manufacturers. Companies such as Panasonic, Samsung, and LG are getting squeezed on margins, as prices continue to decline. Even 4K displays will succumb to tight margins as the market matures. Inevitably the market will be taken over by manufacturers that can tolerate thinner margins at the expense of higher volumes. The need to differentiate will be paramount. If manufacturers are listening, here are a few specifications for guidance:

  • LCD Technology: IPS (In-Plane Switching)[xiv]
  • Bezel: none! Let’s finally get rid of it.
  • Screen Aspect Ratio: 21:9
  • Resolution: 5K Display (5120 × 2160)
  • Integrated Speakers: No! Enthusiasts want a separate surround sound audio experience.
  • Inputs: 3 x HDMI[xv]0, 2 x Display Port [xvi], 2x USB[xvii], 1 x 1Gbps Ethernet, BlueTooth, built-in WiFi[xix]
  • vSync: at least 120Hz
  • Wall Mounts: VESA 100mm, 200mm, and 400mm mounts
  • 3D: No one cares!
  • Smart TV: Yes, please.

There is a growing segment of society who watch their entertainment via computer. These users are willing to invest in 4K without complaining about the lack of content. Regardless, 4K movies and TV shows will likely trickle to market as we approach the end of the decade. The entertainment industry already sits on a vast library of 4K movies that were digitized years ago, for their Blu-ray release. It’s just a matter of time before consumers get to experience them. In the meantime, there’s no reason to wait.

• Synopsis

• Consumers complain that there is no content available to justify the purchase of a 4K TV. But many users already enjoy 4K on their tablets, computers, and laptops. None of them are complaining. At 2 feet away 4K is a display, and at 10 feet away it’s a TV. What if there is a new viewing experience that converges 4K into a single gateway to everything that is gaming, entertainment, and computing? There is a missed opportunity for screen manufacturers – It’s a 4K 21:9 monitor that addresses an evolved viewing experience. The 5-foot viewing experience is the next evolution in display technology.

• References

[i] 10-foot experience, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10-foot_user_interface

[ii] Cord-cutting 101, http://www.digitaltrends.com/topic/cord-cutting-101/

[iii] Display aspect ratio, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_aspect_ratio

[iv] Blu-ray, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc

[v] 21:9 aspect ratio, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21:9_aspect_ratio

[vi] “8K is not the future of TV. We think 21:9 Ultra Widescreen is instead. Here’s why… “, by David Shapton, Redsharknews.com, http://www.redsharknews.com/technology/item/1370-8k-is-not-the-future-of-tv-we-think-21-9-ultra-widescreen-is-instead

[vii] Samsung, http://www.samsung.com/us/video/uhd-tv

[viii] Aspect ratio (image), Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_%28image%29

[ix] 4K Resolutions, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution

[x] CinemaScope, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CinemaScope

[xi] SMPTE, Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Motion_Picture_and_Television_Engineers

[xii] Optimum HDTV viewing distance, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimum_HDTV_viewing_distance

[xiii] HDTV Set Up, THX, http://www.thx.com/consumer/home-entertainment/home-theater/hdtv-set-up/

[xiv] “LCD Panel Technology: IPS, VA, PLS, AHVA & TN Monitors”, http://www.pchardwarehelp.com/guides/lcd-panel-types.php

[xv] HDMI, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI

[xvi] Display Port, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

[xvii] USB, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB

[xviii] Audio jack, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phone_connector_%28audio%29

[xix] 802.11, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11

• About the Author

Home - Signature, Gabriel Dusil ('12, shadow, teal)Gabriel Dusil was recently the Chief Marketing & Corporate Strategy Officer at Visual Unity, with a mandate to advance the company’s portfolio into next-generation solutions and expand the company’s global presence. Before joining Visual Unity, Gabriel was the VP of Sales & Marketing at Cognitive Security, and Director of Alliances at SecureWorks, responsible for partners in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Previously, Gabriel worked at VeriSign & Motorola in a combination of senior marketing & sales roles. Gabriel obtained a degree in Engineering Physics from McMaster University, in Canada and has advanced knowledge in Online Video Solutions, Cloud Computing, Security as a Service (SaaS), Identity & Access Management (IAM), and Managed Security Services (MSS).

• Tags

•Ÿ 10 foot experience, 2 foot 10 foot, 2 foot experience, 21:9, 21:9 display, 40 degree viewing angle. 48″ + 21×9 + monitor, 48 inch display, 48″ + 21:9 + monitor, 48” display, 4K 21:9, 4K TV, Broadcast, CinemaScope, cord cutter, cord cutting, Digital Video, display aspect ratio, dusil.com, Gabriel Dusil, gabrieldusil.com, Internet Video, OTT, Over the Top Content, OVP, Panasonic, Samsung, second screen, SMPTE, THX, THX viewing angle, UHD, Ultra HD, 48″ + 21×9 + display, 48″ + 21:9 + display, 48″ + 21×9 + TV, 48″ + 21:9 + TV

Entertainment • 30 Movies that Need a Sequel!

Attention, Fans of Cinema!

A lot has been written about Hollywood running out of original ideas.  In fact, it may be argued that this has already been partially addressed with the Hollywood “black list”, which started back in 2004 –  It’s a publication of the top 100 screenplays yet to be produced.

This blog post rather focuses on what Hollywood loves to do best – producing remakes and sequels. And I’m fine with that.  Maybe the following list of 30 movies (not counting follow-on sequels to round out trilogies, and such) will help guide the big-wigs in right direction. Mind you, I’m not privy to the politics, copyright tie-ups, or industry in-fighting related to the background of releasing these movies. So, apologies to those in-the-know if my list is a no-brainer, or already in pre-production (some in fact, already are planned to be released shortly).  If that is the case, then consider this post as affirmation that producers are on the right track.

…I take that back… no apologies from my side!  I’m just another humble movie lover, just like you (if you a reading my post).  I love being immersed in a great story, on a THX certified 15 meter screen with 22.2 surround sound, chowing down on popcorn that has been marked-up by 3,000%!

So here we go…  This is my collection of great movies that seriously need to be remade, or at least get green-lit for a sequel immediately – for no other reason than they were awesome, and are due for some serious modern-day production infusion. Have I missed anything? Chime in with your comments below.

Heroes

City Hunter (1993)

This movie was my introduction to Jackie Chan. Back in 1993, when I first moved to Prague, I went to the movies with my friend Rob Fridrich, deep in the suburbs of Prague, in an aging shopping mall. We were planing to see something totally different, and found ourselves sitting and watching City Hunter. We decided to give it 10 minutes – If we didn’t like it we would leave.  It was initially difficult to overcome the quirky English dubbing, but after that it was a wild ride through to the end, and the experience created two more life-long Jackie Chan fans. I just can’t figure out why he didn’t make a whole bunch of these.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0451279/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2

Wonder Woman (TBD)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0217869/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Unbreakable (2000)

What’s taking so long!? Was Megan Fox asking for too much money? Just pay her what she wants, and make the film, so that my expectation-anxiety can be put to rest.  Anyway, it seems that something is already in the works. I wait with baited anticipation. Both Samuel L. Jackson and Bruce Willis are at their best as villain and hero.  With Night (we’re on a middle name basis) not able to pull off the same level of brilliance in his recent pictures, maybe a sequel is in order, no?

 

Thriller

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0289043/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

28 Days Later (2002 & 2007)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1259521/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Cabin in the Woods (2011)

Please do “28 months Later”.  This then leaves room for “28 Years later”, to round out a beautifully constructed quadrilogy. This movie was simply brilliant! It redefined the horror genre for many people.  I can only hope that they will do a series of prequels and/or sequels.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1228987/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Let Me In (2010)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1029234/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Martyrs (2008)

In fact, I loved the Swedish original “Let the Right One In” better than this one. Regardless, I think there is a lot of scope to turn this into a franchise. Granted, this is a very hard movie to watch.  But for the torture-porn genre, it’s a giant amongst men. The story-line is Hostel-esque, and deserves the same trilogy treatment.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1187064/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Triangle (2009)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0905372/?ref_=nv_sr_2

The Thing (1982 & 2011)

This is such a completely mind-blowing film. I’m surprised it hasn’t resulted in a franchise already. Prequel, sequel, remake! I don’t care!  Just make another one, two, or three more of these, please.

Drama & Suspense

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091635/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_33

9½ Weeks (1986)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0266308/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Battle Royale (2000 & 2003)

Who, in my x-Generation, didn’t fall in love with Kim Basinger, and want to be cool like Mickey Rourke when this movie first came out? I think that a remake would be a real treat for the Millennial generation. Who’s with me? I had such an adrenaline rush when I saw this the first time ’round.  I think it would be an awesome Hollywood remake for today’s American audience.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119174/?ref_=nv_sr_1

The Game (1997)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080120/?ref_=fn_al_tt_5

The Warriors (1979)

This is another example of great story telling, with David Fincher at the helm.  I can’t figure out why they didn’t franchise this one, as well. I saw this in my teens, and it was riveting at the time.  I think it should be redone as a Mixed Martial Arts movie.  MMA fans chime in and let’s start a petition!

Historical

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075572/?ref_=fn_al_tt_4

Roots (1977)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0172495/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Gladiator (2000)

Now that 12 Years a Slave won the best picture Oscar in 2014, maybe the world is ready for a reboot of this Alex Haley epic novel?  Looks like it may already be in the works How many times does Ridley Scott have to be asked in an interview if he will make a prequel/sequel to Gladiator, before he finally gives in? I think it’s Russell Crowe‘s Magnum Opus.

Fantasy

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0416449/?ref_=nv_sr_2

300 (2006)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0101272/?ref_=fn_al_tt_4

Addams Family (1991 & 1993)

The sequel is already in the theaters as I write this blog post. I’m just hoping for a trilogy. Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes stole the show, in my opinion! OK, I know that the brilliant Raul Julie died in 1994 (RIP), preventing this franchise from continuing. But there must be another way!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448157/?ref_=nv_sr_1 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1498780/?ref_=nv_sr_2

Hancock (2008 & TBD)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0489099/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Jumper (2008)

We should have already seen this as a trilogy… like… a long time ago! Am I right?  What’s up with that? Will Smith was awesome.  This is another obvious trilogy in my view. IMDB is indicating that something is in the works… sigh! What happened to this story? I thought it was an obvious candidate for a sequel.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120737/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Lord of the Rings (2001, ’02, ’03)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117038/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Michael (1996)

I’m not talking about the Hobbit trilogy. Once they make a billion US$ from that, then please keep going and bring Silmarillion to the big screen. I understand that it will probably need some serious rewriting, but I’m confident that the artistic collective of Hollywood, and the Shire, can pull it off. John Travolta did a great job as a convincing angel.  There seems to be a lot of scope for many more angel movies.  How about “Gabriel”. Maybe I just have an affinity to angel movies 🙂 Wink Wink Nudge Nudge.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1663662/?ref_=nv_sr_1 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2557478/?ref_=nv_sr_2

Pacific Rim (2013 & TBD)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0822847/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Priest (2011)

My boys and I loved this movie. Guillermo del Toro did an wicked job of bringing great characters together in this Godzilla + Transformers theme. Paul Bettany was fantastic in this flick. Please make it into a trilogy! Vampires in a dystopian future! What’s better than that?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113497/?ref_=nv_sr_1 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2283362/?ref_=nv_sr_3

Jumanji (1995 & TBD)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0253556/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Reign of Fire (2002)

Seems that something may be in the works. They buried the game at the end of the movie, for f’s sake! A sequel is a no-brainer. Bring back all the original cast, …even if they’re just cameos… pretty please! One of Christian Bale‘s pre-A-list movies.  I loved the dystopian + dragon story line.  This is one of the few live action dragon movies that I like.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458481/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Sin City (2004 & 2014)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0122718/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Small Soldiers (1998)

I know we are in for another one this year.  I just hope that Robert Rodriguez keeps making more of them. Wouldn’t today’s CGI be awesome for this story? I think it’s due for a long overdue reboot. Lots of scope here. Message to Hollywood: “It’s Toy Story on steroids!”

 

SiFi

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114746/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

12 Monkeys (1995 & 2014)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1731141/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Ender’s Game (2013)

This is early Brad Pitt as a crazy dude. Unforgettable!  Definitely scope for as sequel. What are you guys in Hollywood waiting for?  Can I help in any way?  Just give me a call… Something is in the works,… maybe? OK, I don’t know what Hollywood will do with this one, but there are six books in the series, right? Besides the fact that the poor kid has ‘ass’ and ‘butt’ in his name,… never mind… Asa Butterfield was brilliant! …I digress…
This movie is simply epic.  Best performances ever from Ethan Hawke and Jude Law.  I would love to see this as a mini-series.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Gattaca (1997)